Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the universities' approach in determining courses on the students' success. In this regard, one controversial question is whether it is better that universities force students to take history courses or not. Despite the arguments asserting that the students should be required to take history classes, I believe otherwise, maintaining that taking history classes have negative effects on the students. To support this, there are myriads of reasons, two of which are going to be aptly elucidated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that studying history could waste the students' energy and time. During the semesters, the students' time is limited. Therefore, it is far better for them to focus on the courses related to their major. By doing so, they will more successful in their future job. For instance, when I was a bachelor student, I had to get three history courses. Because of mandatory history courses, I could not get other courses that could help me to learn some software related to my field of study. Had not the university forced me to take history classes, I would have learned some extra information related to my career.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that all the students do not have an interest in history. Forcing all the students from different majors to take history classes, may decrease their motivation to study other courses which are important for them. Recently a study was carried out at the University of Tehran about the effect of irrelevant classes on the students' grades in the courses related to their major. Researchers evaluated the university's students' grades in different semesters in ten years period. According to the results obtained, in the semesters that the students had unrelated courses, they get 15 percent less in related courses compared to the semesters that they did not have irrelevant courses.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned reasons into account, one can conclude that history course can have adverse effects on the students because not only does it waste students' time and energy, but also it decreases their motivation in studying other courses.
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should assign homework for students every day 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Human presence on Venus 75
- Flying birds through the buildings glasses 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... approach in determining courses on the students success. In this regard, one controvers...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s that studying history could waste the students energy and time. During the semesters, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09433962264 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69907299332 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498652291105 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2425803079 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.176470588 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306834410231 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103436891002 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474074421201 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200317079737 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041156818797 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.