Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the role that teachers have on the students and the society's success. In this regard, one controversial question is whether teachers' value in society were more in the past or nowadays. Despite the arguments asserting that today teachers have more appreciation in society, I believe otherwise, maintaining that they had more value in the past. To support this, there are myriads of reasons, two of which are going to be aptly elucidated through the following paragraphs.
First and foremost. the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that in the past teachers were the model role of either students or other people in society. However, nowadays people are influenced by other individuals such as company owners and artists. These alterations have led to a remarkable decline in teachers' position in society. Recently a study has been carried out at the University of Tehran about the difference of teachers' value in society between today and twenty years before. Scientists assessed some peoples' ideas, which were selected randomly, about the teachers' value in now and the past. According to the results obtained, teachers have less appreciation today in comparison to the past.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that thanks to the advent of new technologies and access to different sources, students could learn many things without the need for teachers. Therefore, teachers' value has decreased not only among the students but also in society. For instance, my younger brother, who is a high school student, most of the time browses the web to find information about his lessons. So, he does not have a high motivation to go to school and learn his lessons from teachers. This has caused the value of his teachers to become less in his mind. Also, my brother's thought about his teachers has had an adverse effect on our parents' ideas about the teachers.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned reasons to account, one can conclude that in the past, teachers were more appreciated because they had a high social level. In addition, they had more effect on students' success.
- Coal ash 76
- The reading passage explains some theories about the sources of the strange sounds heard by Russian submarines However the lecturer finds all the ideas discussed by the reading passage dubious and suggests some evidence to refute them all First the writer 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 73
- Elephants 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...lowing paragraphs. First and foremost. the most prominent reason that comes to my ...
^^^
Line 2, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...les ideas, which were selected randomly, about the teachers value in now and the ...
^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...l. In addition, they had more effect on students success.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0027700831 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66968762006 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537396121884 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2892097256 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0526315789 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280957819938 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890792950255 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816600212753 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19400692822 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890944801415 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.