Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the influence of young people in the society. In this regard, one controversial quastion is whether youngs have influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society or not. Despite the argument asserting that nowdays young people have no contribution in major decisions, I believe otherwise, maintaining that nowdays youngs impact on societies future is more that any time in the past. To support this, there are myriad of reasons, two of which are going to be aptly elucidated through the following patagraphs.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that nowdays thank to contribution of young people in government, a greate apportunaty is provided them to participate in major decisions for the society. For example, recently in my country a young person has been designated as a commuinication minister. Despite he has started his work only few monthes, he has made a lot of good decisions that leads to improvment in the internet quality of the whole country. Had not been selected young person as a communication minister, the internet quality would not has improved in short time.
Fourthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that young people have better knowledge on constant updated technology. Therefore, managers prefer to advantage youngs' thoughts. This helps managers to make decisions that has compliant with the nowdays circumistance. For instance, after graduation from university I started working as a member of group which its duty was providing a regulation to decrease buildings energy consumption. Allways our manager asked young members to contribute in decision making in meetings because he believed that youngs have better information about softwares used in building energy simiulation.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned reasons to account, one can conclude that young people today have significant influence on the decision making because they participate in governments. In addition, they work as a advisor of many manegers.
- Human presence on Venus 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 80
- Taxes to the cigarettes 75
- The reading passage explains some theories about the sources of the strange sounds heard by Russian submarines However the lecturer finds all the ideas discussed by the reading passage dubious and suggests some evidence to refute them all First the writer 73
- Elephants 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...inister, the internet quality would not has improved in short time. Fourthermore, ...
^^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... governments. In addition, they work as a advisor of many manegers.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3303030303 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99840943449 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8556104454 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.266666667 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300860479566 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940969534725 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824541521434 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17445043625 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919098378925 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.