Coal ash
The power companies assert that using liner for protecting from leaking coal lash to the environment cause some problems. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas discussed by the companies dubious and suggests some evidence to refute them all.
First, the power companies claim that according to the existed regulation, they should use special liner-material to prevent leaking coal ash components to the environment. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that current regulation is not sufficient because it forces companies to use liner only when they build new ponds or landfills. However, for preserving the environment companies should add liner to the old ponds and landfills.
Furthermore, the companies assert that by providing strict regulation for storing and handling coal ash, cause that consumers stop using products which are created from recycling coal ash because they will think that these products are dangerous. Conversely, the speaker underlines the fact that the new regulation will not reduce the demand for recycled products. Other experiences about other harmful materials such as mercury have shown that people buy products that produced from recycled materials with strict regulations.
Finally, the power companies believe that the new regulation could increase consumers' electricity prices due to the rise in companies' expenses from adding new liners. The lecturer, on the other hand, makes the arguments that despite using liners by companies adds extra cost to the electricity generation process, it increases consumers' electricity price only one percent which is a minuscule amount for consumers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Vivian Chang | 3 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Zmx_6 | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | tststs | 3 | view |
- Human presence on Venus 75
- Taxes to the cigarettes 75
- Sending humans to Mars 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Elephants 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56916996047 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75532346596 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557312252964 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6753459978 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.9 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165713936549 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706544433132 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121841080408 0.0662205650399 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100918826698 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783968277715 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.