While majoring in Computer Science, I was required to take basic science courses like Physics and Biology in the first three years of my undergraduate study. My classmates hold different viewpoints when it comes to whether these irrelevant syllabuses should be made compulsory for us. As for me, I oppose all the college students being required to take basic science courses regardless of their majors, for the two reasons elaborated below.
In the first place, taking basic science courses can put additional academic pressure on students. It’s well-acknowledged that no matter what majors the students pursue, they are obliged to fully comprehend a series of professional courses, where students are expected to make efforts to master the certain essential theories or indispensable skills. Furthermore, numerous projects and examinations are employed to examine whether they understand and have become proficient in knowledge of the specific field or not. Taking these situations into consideration, a large proportion of students have already been under intense stress, not to mention how much pressure they will tolerate after basic science courses being added into their curriculums. Take my experience as an example, during my sophomore year, when several non-trivial computer courses like Algorithms and Data Structure were required to take, the only way I can master them is programming a lot in order to finish the projects assigned by professors, which were quite time-consuming and exhausting. However, at the same time, Physics was also demanded according to the curriculum assignment. As a result, faced with another unfamiliar subject, I found myself under great amounts of stress because I had more classes to attend and more tests to review for. To get good performance in all these subjects. I endeavored to code for courses in Computer Science and do the exercises for Physics at the expense of time and quality of my sleep. If I had a choice, I would not choose to have the basic science class, since those core courses were challenging enough for me to study.
In addition, taking basic science courses might cost lots of valuable time of students to equip themselves with other skills, such as communication, team cooperation, and leadership. Given that a student has to attend multiple additional classes and accomplish extra numerous projects, time and energy for him to enhance other skills must be limited while for those who only need to concentrate on their own fields of study, they can make use of the spare time to participate in various activities to improve those skills. The contrast between my friend Linda, majoring in Accounting and me can illustrate this point. She was not required to take basic science courses as I was. As a result, she had more time to participate in students union and clubs such as public speaking club, where she practiced and got used to delivering speeches to the public, while I was still afraid of even speaking in front of people till nowadays.
In a nutshell, although there exist a few benefits to attend basic science courses such as more equipped knowledge, it’s not a wise choice to require every college student enroll into the irrelevant lessons due to the fact that too much pressure on course learning and test-preparation would definitely overburden the students academically and prevent them enhancing other skills.
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study. 76
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1097, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d exhausting. However, at the same time, Physics was also demanded according to t...
^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oncentrate on their own fields of study, they can make use of the spare time to p...
^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In a nutshell, although there exist a few benefits to attend basic science ...
^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a nutshell, although there exist a few benefits to attend basic science courses...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llege student enroll into the irrelevant lessons due to the fact that too much pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, while, as for, as to, in addition, such as, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2866.0 1977.66487455 145% => OK
No of words: 549.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2204007286 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87573407734 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 902.7 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.6185397521 48.9658058833 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.842105263 100.406767564 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8947368421 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272472165906 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891524596161 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686988346878 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176812329999 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459418234006 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.