Saying trust and avoid ling in my idea is absolutely the most important issue in any relationship. It formes the foundations of relationships and helps people to rely more on each other. More reliance would lead to more relations and leads to a more integrated society and more pace in developing economies.
First of all, any sort of relationship is fundamentally based on trustworthiness. To explain that, social relations like business affairs, trade partnerships, marriage or mutual relationships, and other friendships are become reinforced by trustworthiness. This would definitely cause relations to become longer and deeper. In this case, the most important element that can violate trustworthily is any sort of hypocrisy, items like fake reputations, pompous speeches, unreal appearances, and … in any of these issues the other side, however, may deceive for the first time, but definitely will lose his reliance on our reputation.
Secondly, saying in the right manner and telling always trust is contagious and would become the culture for society. It is like a game that everyone would gain more if tells trust. It becomes a win-win game for all unless one wants to violate the game. Although he can gain a little bit more than who lied to, in the second round in near future the lier would be a victim. It was the theory that John Nash in the 90’s decade elaborated about contagious behaviours in society.
To sum up, the importance of being always trustful by telling always trust is not just for short needs like mutual relationships or short friendships, It is a necessity for living in a society and playing the best role as a responsible citizen, knowing trust is contagious.
- Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates for the past several decades food processing companies have also been adding salicylates to foods as
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 93
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
Saying trust and avoid ling in my idea is absolutely the most impor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...iolate the game. Although he can gain a little bit more than who lied to, in the second ro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, sort of, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 281.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06049822064 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01285014431 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583629893238 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.8470630034 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.384615385 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11121995249 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421160721265 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440153220922 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069381291093 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220893618311 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.