Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that the world developing fast nowadays , and the live has become more dynamic than it was before. This fast living life makes people feel kind of sad and unhappy. I state this opinion for some good reasons that I will elaborate below.
To begin with, the life in the past was more relaxed and slow, because people did not have to drive to get in their workplace. People did their duties without having to rush as we do nowadays, and this was because they were less stressed. They were farmers and were working for themselves, so there was no one to ask them to hurry or to complain about how they doing their job. Being self- employed gave them power and hope. This kind of live made them feel more happy and satisfied. Also, they were more healthy. For example, my grandfather had his own farm, and worked for himself for seventy years. He was always smily, thankful and healthy.
Furthermore, in the past people lived close to each other, this made them be happy as well. The transportation vehicles were not as fast as they are in the present time. This made them live closer with thei family members, their children and firends. Beign close to the ones you love is always a happy live. I say this because I personally live so far from my family, and this makes me feel so sad and himesick. I live in Unites States and they are in Europe in Macedonia. If the lives was little slower that it is actually, I would have been back in my contry, if I did not have aeroplanes to fly to other places. And of course more happy. I want to say that people in the pst did not have those opportunities and as a result they stayed in the same place happy and thankful.
To sum up, being too steressed as we are nowadays and leaving in a world that is changing every day, will alwasys make us more sad and less happy that the people who lived before us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- four days work 60
- earthquakes 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- elephant s behaviors 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... that the world developing fast nowadays , and the live has become more dynamic th...
^^
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mselves, so there was no one to ask them to hurry or to complain about how they d...
^^
Line 2, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was always smily, thankful and healthy. Furthermore, in the past people lived cl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, kind of, no doubt, of course, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32571428571 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18071395376 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5504640671 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0952380952 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239578095135 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689181250907 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553107050056 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147964209575 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284056396288 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 11.7677419355 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.54 10.9000537634 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.