Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world today is just so busy and crowded, we should not expect people to be polite to one another.
In the wake of urbanization, increasingly more people live in metropolises with millions of strangers residing within their locality. And many would argue that since people are busy with their lives, they no longer need to be polite to others. However, I believe otherwise for the following reasons.
First, proverbial wisdom teaches that “all for one and one for all.” If people treat others nicely, other people will do the same in return, ultimately benefiting everyone in the community. It is true that, in crowded cities, most people one runs into will be strangers. And one will rarely be able to see them anymore for the rest of one’s life. But this does not mean that smiling urbanely at other people is a terrible choice. And this is because when everyone carries a happy mood around, affecting the people they encounter that day, those people receiving the decorum will become delighted. They would then pass this positive atmosphere to people they meet, making more people feel lighthearted. And this cycle goes on, eventually making everyone, including those who initiated the virtuous circle, enjoy days filled with joyful excitement.
Second, respecting others makes one socially desirable. How one behaves shall not be determined by the environment in which one lives, which means the crowdedness or business of modern-day life can not be an excuse for indulging oneself in rudeness in social situations. The reason is that how people perceive others is primarily due to the behaviors they observe. Therefore, when they encounter impoliteness, regardless of the reasons behind it, they will deem whoever shows it ill-mannered and would, consequently, not treat them seriously in return. However, if one is always polite to others, they will think this person courteous and respectful. So, they would be more likely to have social interactions, such as befriending or offering needed assistance. With a well-received reputation, one will also be more likely to gain trust from people they socialize with, benefiting one in realistic terms. For example, employers would entrust this person with critical tasks, ensuing potential promotions.
To conclude, politely treating others lifts the mood of everyone and brings social benefits to oneself.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends your same age 76
- Imagine that you want to improve your performance in order to get better grades marks at school or to get a promotion or higher pay at work You are considering the following ways Doing additional work or extra assignments beyond what is required Participa 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Some people believe showing people happy images pictures in which great achievements are made in helping the poor is more effective in encouraging them to take action to solve poverty than showing them 84
- During big events such as graduations or weddings some people choose to record many videos and take numerous photos while others think they just need to take a few or no videos or pictures Which choice or decision do you prefer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33983286908 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74522109419 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596100278552 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6040754383 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.894736842 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205997832522 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695811253425 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436775536106 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123262973692 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520300983869 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33983286908 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74522109419 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596100278552 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6040754383 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.894736842 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205997832522 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695811253425 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436775536106 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123262973692 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520300983869 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.