Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
The best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of gasoline for cars?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
The debate over the air pollution and governments' decisions that should take has always a prominent issue among people. While some people may do not agree with raising the cost of gasoline by government, I am strongly on the belief that expensive car fuel surely reduces the air pollution. I will provide my reasons in the fallowing paragraphs.
To begin, since most of the air pollution is result of cars pollutions, government by the increasing the gasoline price, eliminates the short distance and unnecessary car commuting because make it for them unreasonable to pay lots of money for gasoline, which waste for unnecessary commuting. When the cost of fuel was high, people prefer to walk or use public transportation for their short distance commuting. To illustrate, if they want buy their daily staff including, milk, food, etc. They prefer to walk to their neighboring market, instead of using their car. This reducing in car usage, has positive impact on air cleanness in large scale definitely.
In addition, by enhancing the cost of gasoline, government make money, which help it to take actions in order to reducing the air pollution. If the government has enough money, it can improve transportation infrastructure, increasing the quality of public transportation systems including, buying new buses, improving the quality of subways, establishing monorail stations etc. High quality of transportation systems motivate people to use public transportation, meaning reduction in using of cars, which lead to decreasing in air pollution.
To conclude, it seems to me, government can reduce the air pollution by increasing the gasoline price. By increasing the gasoline price government can prevent unnecessary car usage and also make money and improve the public transportation, which make an incentive for people to use public transportation, leading to less car usage.
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 70
- Universities should spend more money in improving facilities like libraries and computer labs rather than hiring famous teachers 76
- More and more people are working from home and telecommuting with their offices Is this a positive trend 90
- Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave Do you agree or disagree Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 73
- It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 15.1003584229 13% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 296.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39189189189 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11429319958 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7857491777 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286001371702 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102232439117 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672189982309 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181190913536 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560311624239 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.