Raising kids is a difficult job. There are different parenting styles that are adopted worldwide. Personally, I believe that children should comply with strict rules set by their parents. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
Firstly, adherence to strict regulations by young people will bring discipline to their life. Kids often do not understand importance of of doing right things on right time. They are more interested in doing what they enjoy. Parents should thus set rules so that essentials are not skipped. My personal experience is compelling example of this. When I was a kid, I hated eating green leafy vegetables. However, my parents had set following rule for the entire family - leafy vegetables must be included in our diet at least twice a week. I tried to protest against this but it had zero impact on them. Either eat veggies or eat nothing was their strategy. At that time, I had no option left and I started eating what my mother served without any complaints. I had no idea about vitamins and minerals provided by those healthy meals but today I realise its importance when I see my friends struggling with their health. I am so habitual to eating healthy stuff now that I include it in my diet even when I cook for myself.
Secondly, children do have have a foresight and often do not think neutral. They live in current moment while their parents who have long term vision can spot dangers they can face in upcoming future. Kids compare themselves with children of their age and want everything that other child owns. It is very hard but important for parents to strictly say no in such situations. For instance, when my cousin brother saw his friends getting expensive mobile phones from their parents he started feeling jealous. He asked his parents for letting him have his own phone. His parents understood the situation and set a rule - No mobile using inside their house unless it is extremely important. My brother had a hard time initially since he handled his parents devices all the time when they were home. Since everybody was from this gadget , they started spending quality time together and my brother slowly understood saying yes to this strict rule eventually benefited him. If his parents had bought him new phone in very early age he would have been addicted to the device by now which may have caused him health issues like impaired vision , insecure mindset and obesity.
In conclusion, I believe that child should be asked to adhere to the strict rules set by his/her parents because it brings discipline to child's life and can save them from dangers even when they lack foresight.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...Kids often do not understand importance of of doing right things on right time. They ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 24, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
... for myself. Secondly, children do have have a foresight and often do not think neut...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 29, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...myself. Secondly, children do have have a foresight and often do not think neut...
^^^^
Line 6, column 140, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...oment while their parents who have long term vision can spot dangers they can face i...
^^^^
Line 6, column 834, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...me. Since everybody was from this gadget , they started spending quality time toge...
^^
Line 6, column 1138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d him health issues like impaired vision , insecure mindset and obesity. In c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, at least, for instance, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 78.0 43.0788530466 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81344902386 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44089905705 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55748373102 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3041845286 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1851851852 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0740740741 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40740740741 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180945451411 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053924307962 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675449456496 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13940600132 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638261590319 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.