Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should be given a modest weekly allowance for doing household chores. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Do not use memorized examples.
I agree with the notion that children should be provided with a modest weekly allowance for participating in household chores. Offering a financial incentive not only teaches children the importance of responsibility but also instills a sense of financial management from an early age. For instance, as children complete various chores, such as cleaning their rooms or helping with dishes, they develop a work ethic and learn to associate effort with tangible rewards, preparing them for the realities of adult life.
Moreover, a modest weekly allowance serves as an effective way to teach children about budgeting and financial responsibility. By receiving a fixed amount regularly, children can learn the value of saving, spending wisely, and making thoughtful choices with their money. This practical experience contributes significantly to their financial literacy, ensuring that they grow up with essential life skills that extend beyond the realm of household chores.
On the other hand, opponents may argue that children should engage in chores without expecting monetary compensation to cultivate a sense of duty and responsibility. While this perspective holds merit, it overlooks the fact that a modest allowance acts as a tool for teaching financial awareness rather than diminishing the importance of chores. In fact, it transforms mundane tasks into valuable lessons about earning and managing money effectively.
In conclusion, providing children with a modest weekly allowance for participating in household chores is a beneficial practice. It not only motivates them to contribute to the family's well-being but also imparts valuable lessons in responsibility and financial management. The key lies in finding a balance, where the focus remains on nurturing a sense of duty while simultaneously equipping children with the practical skills necessary for their future endeavors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | WatermelonUCLA | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | WatermelonUCLA | 60 | view |
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should be given a modest weekly allowance for doing household chores Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion Do not use memorized examples 76
- Imagine you have been offered jobs by two different companies at the same rate of pay One of the companies will provide you with many interesting and challenging projects to work on but it offers very few vacation days The job at the other company do not 60
- Many people maintain that economic development should be slowed down so as not to harm the environment Do you agree or disagree 81
- People who try to acquire more than one skill are more likely to become successful than people who just focus on one skill Agree or disagree 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 284.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72535211268 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08116900864 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580985915493 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7848585415 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.45110844103 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188586718855 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823521852132 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845168462142 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123691344586 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428171268278 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 10.9000537634 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.