Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Countries should spend more money on the exploration of outer space than on the preservation of the environment.
People spend time and money to explore outer space easier than before. Some people may state that countries should spend more money on the exploration of outer space while others argue that the cost of money on preservation of the environment is a crucial problem need to be solved. In my opinion, I disagree with the following statement that human should contribute in outer space exploration for several reasons.
First of all, exploration of outer space costs amounts of money. To illustrate, government construct rocket to explore space and the budgets of training the astronauts from the tax, both spend too much expenses in the country. On the other hand, if the money will ne used to the environment preservation then it can solve many emergency problems. In addition, the water shortage or crop failure problems are closer in people’s life than the outer space exploration.
Second, human waste too many resources on space exploration. For instance, to build spaceship it needs lots of rarely metal, aluminum is one of the metal used to construct the money and time to build it, the process during emitting spaceship with separate part of the spaceship which may not reuse anymore. As a result, the more expenses people spend on space exploration, the more resources they waste.
Third, the preservation of environment is more influential for people’s lives. To be specific, global warming causes polar bears losing their habitats and the rising od marine level make some islands disappear. As a result, animals and human lose their foods and house more than before. Those problems are an emergency and a problem than exploring outer space because they are just happening now.
Definitely, some people may state that outer space exploration is necessary because human needs to discover other possible planet to live. However, even humans try to explore universe, earth’s environment is crucial problems due to the disasters which bring damage to human and other species. To conclude, countries should not spend money to explore outer space but should focus on environment preservation because the feedback is lower than the loss.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | chuehweihuan | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should buy domestic products even though the products are more expensive than foreign products 87
- Which do you prefer: resolving a problem through emails and text messages or resolving it through phone calls and voice mails? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to buy a new technological device right away than to wait until others have adopted it. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to increase the quality of education is to increase teachers’ salaries. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Countries should spend more money on the exploration of outer space than on the preservation of the environment. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...astronauts from the tax, both spend too much expenses in the country. On the other h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25287356322 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71135727095 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.634023937 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.529411765 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400713108518 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144024015829 0.076458572812 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112889552048 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242952701684 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136526415395 0.0645574589148 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.