Population in most of the cities around world have been increasing continuously and people suffer several problems such as heavy traffic. Governments and city administrations are searching ways to solve the traffic problem such as balancing the traffic by public transportation and building alternative roads. In my opinion, getting a fee from drivers, if they drive in a busy street during heavy traffic, can solve problems for following two reasons.
First, even if governments are applying some solutions on the crowded streets, the citizens do not benefit them when there is no restriction. However, when they are obliged to pay money to use specific streets, they will look for alternative solutions. For example, I know a few people in my city, who is not willing to use public transportation to go to their job. However, they also do not want to spend money for this purpose. A few years ago, during the economic crisis in my country, Greece, the price of gasoline increased %50 suddenly. After the dramatic increase, a few of them started to go to work by bus. If the roads used by them changes as pay to use, they can again leave to use the busy street as it became during crisis.
Second, this kind of change would not avoid people to do whatever they do but provides lots of benefits. Some of the benefits could be decrease in unnecessary use of car, which is also good for decreasing air pollution, and increase in income of governments or local administrations. For example, in my country a similar system is tried on a city, Lund, 2 years ago. The city had not been carrying the population and traffic was a serious problem. The city council decided to make some streets paid. With the new system, the traffic problem have almost completely solved. Some surveys which are done five year period, showed that the air quality have increased after the change because of less use of cars. Also, the city administration improved the city's public facilities by using the money made by the pay-to-use system.
As a conclusion, putting some financial burden on people lead them to use existing solutions. Also, this type of change leads some improvements such in air quality or income of government. For these reasons, drivers should pay money if they use a busy street when there is heavy traffic.
- Many of my colleagues will disagree but I believe that the time is right to legalize marijuana Yes this is a hot button issue however there are good reasons why the growing and selling of marijuana should no longer be a criminal offense in the United Stat 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... they do but provides lots of benefits. Some of the benefits could be decrease in unnecessa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, for example, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85569620253 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7286324462 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526582278481 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9047274481 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8095238095 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265616844185 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807418914577 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666757182048 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167142520175 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148921924708 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.