Traffic is the hottest debated topic in the 21st century, and with the growing automobile industry, is expected to be discussed more. People are not opting for the other modes of transport such as City Bus, which is not only environment friendly but also cheaper. Personally, I believe that drivers should pay a hefty fine for driving vehicles on busy city roads. I believe this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
Firstly, it adds up to the noise pollution caused in the city streets. Each year, millions of Americans report hearing problems, are primarily caused by living in a sound stressed environment. Moreover, it is difficult for older adults to survive in this kind of surroundings. My own experience is compelling evidence of this. I have to visit an office that is situated right in the middle of the street crossing. I have observed that there is not a single moment when I don't get to hear the horns, people shouting, and sometimes experiencing street fights. As a result, I am not able to work productively. Also, older colleagues have reported more hearing issues after moving to this location. When I shifted to the other branch located in the middle of the rainforest, I experienced a significant increase in my output.
Secondly, more traffic acts as gasoline to the already existing problem of global warming. The chemicals being released by these vehicles are very harmful to our lungs. It has been observed that individuals living in heavy traffic areas are experiencing health issues. The government has added more eco-friendly public buses into its fleet for reducing such traffic. For example, visiting times square in new york takes you more than 2 hours on weekdays. On the other hand, daily buses are scheduled from different parts of the city to such areas, helping to reduce the congestion on roads by privately owned cars. As a result, if people choose public transport over private ones, then it would help us to reduce existing air pollution marginally.
In conclusion, fining drivers that overcrowd busy streets would help us reduce the caused noise pollution, and also be more eco-friendly.
- Ambitious dreams are better than realistic goals Agree or disagree 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- "The rating system for electronic games is similar to the movie rating system in that it provides consumers with a quick reference so that they can determine if the subject matter and contents are appropriate. This electronic game rating system is no 73
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 70
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 472, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hat there is not a single moment when I dont get to hear the horns, people shouting,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0027700831 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73001773454 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595567867036 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9119645557 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1904761905 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167182964108 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437808452837 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424497720265 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996100463099 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425809734517 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.