Do you agree or disagree the following statement Forbidding sending work related e mails and messages on weekends and holidays is able to improve job satisfaction

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree the following statement?
Forbidding sending work-related e-mails and messages on weekends and holidays is able to improve job satisfaction

An increasing number of companies are now emphasizing the importance of job satisfaction. In order to promote employees' work satisfaction, some companies consider that work-associated texts or emails on holidays are undermining employees' content for their work; whereas others affirm that it will actually improve employees’ satisfaction to their jobs. It is not reasonable, however, to polarize on either side. Depending on different types of employees, flexible policies should be drafted and enacted to cater for each.
Regarding those who are family people, who enjoy spending time with family, companies ought to institute rules that work-related messages should be banned for those workers. Family person does not expect their precious time accompanying family being disturbed. When at home during weekends or holidays, he/she think their family members deserve their wholehearted and solo attention while preparing food, having meals, watching TV, and other family activities. Yet family person especially hates those moments when notifications of work from their bosses popping up at any seconds he/she spends with his/her children, friends, or wife/husband. Take my father as an example. Two years ago, my father joyfully took my brother and me to go fishing on a weekend. Unfortunately, our experience was marred by incessant e-mails from my father's superior. We ended up watching our father replying to his boss's messages. When we were at home, our father felt so frustrated about this disappointing, dreadful experience that he told us that he would like to "fire" his boss and apply for another post.
This is by no means, however, saying that all employees are family-oriented and they should not receive work messages from employers. In reality, there are people who are so aspired and ambitious to their career that they feel they cannot afford wasting any minutes to anything not related to work. These people are normally deemed as workaholics. They are eager to exhibit the hard-working, enterprising, and perseverant aspects of themselves to their employers. Consequently, they desire to work overtime and receive instructions and notifications on holidays, attempting to complete as many projects as possible. Being productive and diligent, they have a greater chance to be noticed by employers, grasp the opportunity to engage in pivotal project, as well as climb the corporate ladder. Certainly, there should be no prejudices to them and their way of living should be equally respected. Thus, companies should be encouraged to assign works for them during holidays.
To conclude, before making a policy go into effect, companies should always consider comprehensively what the best option is for different kinds of employees. When it comes to any employees who are family people, they should be freed from working messages so as not to spoil their job satisfaction. As for those ambitious workers, job-related messages are expected by them so that they can further their career development.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-15 ChaoXiangWang 61 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ChaoXiangWang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ed to cater for each. Regarding those who are family people, who enjoy spending time ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...ome during weekends or holidays, he/she think their family members deserve their whol...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to waste'.
Suggestion: to waste
...areer that they feel they cannot afford wasting any minutes to anything not related to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ployees. When it comes to any employees who are family people, they should be freed fro...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46268656716 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03282101061 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573560767591 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.209811301 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5416666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109140861235 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303566959588 0.076458572812 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358837724252 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770044870774 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250541459016 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ed to cater for each. Regarding those who are family people, who enjoy spending time ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...ome during weekends or holidays, he/she think their family members deserve their whol...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to waste'.
Suggestion: to waste
...areer that they feel they cannot afford wasting any minutes to anything not related to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ployees. When it comes to any employees who are family people, they should be freed fro...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46268656716 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03282101061 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573560767591 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.209811301 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5416666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109140861235 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303566959588 0.076458572812 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358837724252 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770044870774 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250541459016 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.