Nobody can deny the fact and the truth that working plays a vitally important role in every person's life, and it is considered quite critical and crucial. Moreover, it is reality a worldwide known that working formulates the lifespan of all human beings. Based on all the conducted statistics, research, and studies, one may state that a four-day workweek is more benefits than five-day. Actually, I disagree with this statement for so many varied and different reasons.
First, a five-day workweek is more valuable for companies. Many factories will spend much more money if they decide to offer a four-day workweek for their employees. my own experience is a compelling example of this. Three years ago, when I was a financial manager, our company offers an option for their employees working a four-day with 80 percent pay or working overtime. After one year, heading out of all my own data, the company cost much more money for choosing the shortened workweek because we were forced to hire more employees.
Secondly, a regular workweek is more useful for employees. Even though the shortened workweek will improve the quality of employees' lives by spending the extra time with their families, the free time generated by reduced work hours presents a lot of risks for the quality worker's life such as reduction of job stability. Furthermore, it can lose the opportunity of promotion of management positions.
Finally, a four-day workweek is not important for society. In spite of a shortened workweek may reduce the unemployment rate, many companies will force offering overtime work than hiring more employees because they need to pay much more money for training the new employees, for buying more computers and finding more office space. As I mentioned above, when I was a financial manager, is a compelling example of this.
Heading out of all the previously mentioned discussion, I can sum up and conclude that the five-day workweek takes a priority over the four-day workweek due to the fact that it is valuable for companies and because it is useful for people as well as for society.
- TOEFL T P O 47 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TOEFL T P O 22 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task 60
- TPO 47 Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs w 75
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...plays a vitally important role in every persons life, and it is considered quite critic...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
... four-day workweek for their employees. my own experience is a compelling example ...
^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...presents a lot of risks for the quality workers life such as reduction of job stability...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as for, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04011461318 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71364404587 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521489971347 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9843733501 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.9375 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241721637 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10217486575 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842720449807 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15672444785 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507606725885 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.