Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation.
It goes without saying that in such a sophisticated world where the technology is growing so fast that it could hardly be believed, having access to the internet is of great importance. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this idea is whether the government should spend more money on improving access to the internet than on public transportation. I personally contend that the former should be the section which the government appropriates more budget for. In what follows, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the internet has immense impacts on technology improvement. There is no doubt that what we see nowadays as developed public transportation system is a result of technology. As the time moves on, more and more information is uploaded to the internet. Scientists and engineers from all over the world can share their ideas and browse online to develop their conceptual framework, in this way knowledge generation is facilitated. It leads to designing more sophisticated and environment-friendly transportation system to serve humankind.
Another equally significant point is that the internet has been a bed for billions of e-oriented activities. People can exploit e-services of banks from their home and save their time. Moreover, there is no need to use their cars and it is a great way to prevent air pollution. Furthermore, the internet provides the opportunity that people use e-books, e-magazines and other stuff; so there is no more need to cut millions of trees to print these materials. In fact, the internet helps us to go green! So many conferences are held in different places and some people attend these events via the internet from thousands miles away. Those who work and are too busy to participate university courses, can use virtual classes and upgrade their degrees.
Finally, in addition to what was mentioned above, regarding recent technology advances, no one can deny effects of social networks on the society. By means of these networks people can keep in touch with their friends and family members whom may be thousands miles away from them. News and latest events spread all over the world just in a second. All of these have been available just because of the internet. Thanks to the internet, cellphones have turned into more than a device just for calling and texting. So many people use internet on their cellphones for navigation or online services such as ordering a taxi.
To make a long story short, contemplating all aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that promoting access to the internet is an inevitable need of modern society in many ways. Therefore, authorities should put more emphasis on improving access to the internet. It is predicted that the internet will cause great breakthroughs which will definitely astonish everyone.
- Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity. 76
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.First, th 76
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called t 86
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 198 76
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17987152034 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97890459621 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531049250535 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2170327377 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.791666667 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4583333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04166666667 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217758835368 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637671613547 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914967004337 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133063223835 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867185833836 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.