Nowadays, unprecedented burgeoning of the internet makes information exchange rate reach a level more advanced than ever before, which thoroughly affect human beings’ life. In this regard, some people believe that free access to the internet should be provided by governments, while some others disagrees and claim that people should pay for the internet in order to be fair to others who do not want to use it. As far as I am concerned, I suppose that the first idea carries more weight. I will enlarge on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, a number of works are done by the internet these days, so its use should be more convenient for people; one method to achieve that purpose is that governments should give free access to the internet to people. In addition, free access to the internet has a number of great effects on the environment. To put it in a more vivid picture, nowadays, due the development of technology, there are a lot of jobs based on the internet. As a result, should people do not have access to the internet, they will not be able to do their works. As a way of illustration, take banks for example. In the past, people had to go to banks in order to check their accounts. However, nowadays, people can do it in the blink of an eye when they are in their homes, so there is no need to go to banks with their personal cars. Consequently, the less personal cars go out, the less air pollution releases to the atmosphere.
Secondly, in today’s hectic life, people have to work very hard to make ends meet, so they do not have extra money to pay for the internet. Thereby, governments should let them have access to free internet. To clarify this point, life is getting harder day after day. That is due to the fact that, the global population is increasing, so job opportunities are fewer than they were in the past. As a result, people have to accept professions which are not a well-paid one. This means, they have to work from dawn till dusk to meet their families’ supplies. Take workers, who works in a company, for example. They earn money, which is just enough for their primary needs, so they cannot pay extra money for the internet which is a required nowadays. Therefore, governments should meet this need of their nations by providing free access to the internet.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that free access to the internet should be required by governments for their peoples. Given the fact that, not only do people need it to do their works, but also, they do not have more money than how much provide their need in order to pay for the internet.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i suppose, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58350951374 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56660838488 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46088794926 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0082151428 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2608695652 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5652173913 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52173913043 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308128859797 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908196030326 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944773419087 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207658142773 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368260317296 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.