From the dawn of civilization, allocation of budget to public projects has always been a matter for governments. In this regard, some people believe that in today's hectic life, enhancing Internet access is more significant than improving the public transportation, while some others have opposite viewpoint. As far as I am concerned, I have enough reasons to feel that the second idea carries more weight. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the most obvious benefit of using public transportation is its effect on the environment while accessing Internet do not have any direct impact on environment. Undoubtedly, when public transportation develops, people won't use their personal cars which means less carbon dioxide will release into the atmosphere. As a result, the air pollution will decrease dramatically. As a way of illustration, take the comparison of Scandinavian countries, which has reliable public transportations, and some Middle Eastern ones, which suffer from lack of well-developed public transportation. Almost always do people use public transportation in Scandinavian countries, since it is a well-developed system and they can go everywhere with it, so the weather is always in a good condition. Whereas, in some Middle East countries the weather is totally polluted because people do not have a great access to public transportation, so they have to use their own cars. Therefore, the air pollution is increasing in those countries.
Secondly, having a great deal of access to Internet can distract people from doing their main duties. In addition, it persuades people to use their appliances a lot and pay less attention to reading books. Conversely, people can be at their workplace, if they have a comprehensive public transportation. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own experience. Even though bank employees used to do their works very well as they did not have access to Internet, they do not pay enough attention to people's requests nowadays and make a lot of mistakes. Those mistakes are sometimes so deleterious for people that they have to spend a considerable amount of time to correct it.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that governments should dedicate their budgets to public transportation since it is more essential for societies. Given the fact that, it is more beneficial for environment and having access to Internet broadly can prevent people from doing their duties.
- Do you give money to charitable organizations do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used donate money on food or service or leave the decision to the organization 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television has destroyed communication among friends and family Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 894, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great access'.
Suggestion: great access
...lly polluted because people do not have a great access to public transportation, so they have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, i mean, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24752475248 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19580817374 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524752475248 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3978777493 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.578947368 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211790810365 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668209362017 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046043745587 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144374625707 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313868651662 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.