Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the recent decade, humankind is living a hectic lifestyle. That trend is toward having more energy for healthy-hale and ease tension and stress by sports. Entirely disagree with this statement which the government should invest more money in state-sponsored Olympic teams. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, I believe that a variety of sports as professional or excercise intention could consolidate the strength of the body and gives more energy to the person. Professional sportsman enables to encourage the people to do sport and role a model in society. Admittedly, nobody can deny that almost all people have a celebrity or prestigious athletic that pursue of them way in the people's lifestyle, especially doing sport. For example, I love Kimia Alizadeh in Tecvando sport that follows her news as a fan. Interestingly, I like Tecvando and doing exercise this sport whenever I can. Were I Kimia Alizadeh in Tecvando, it would be delightful and honorary for me that I am a well-known sportsman.
Secondly, I believe that a successful sportsman or athletics role a model in society. Everyone usually buffs of some of the athletes that inspired them for their behavior and habits such as doing sport. This a good policy or strategy for the government in order to encouragement for people to doing exercise not only professional aims but also for health intention. It is proved that exercise affects the health of the society and give favor to everyone to overcome some versatile task with energy and active.
In conclusion, all of the reasons I mentioned, I admitted that the government should invest in athletics since they can be successful in international competitions such as Olympic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- Motivation letter of Marziyeh Khavari
- Salicylic acid and kaolin effects on pomological physiological and phytochemical characters of six hazelnuts Corylus avellana cultivars at an arid warm summer condition 70
- ciggarate and junk food 60
- ciggarate and junk food 60
- Motivation letter of Marziyeh Khavari
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...athletic that pursue of them way in the peoples lifestyle, especially doing sport. For ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...l in society. Everyone usually buffs of some of the athletes that inspired them for their b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 17, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ith energy and active. In conclusion, all of the reasons I mentioned, I admitted that th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 290.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05517241379 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94652297155 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541379310345 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4679715075 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7333333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149559405756 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528256991733 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069185503866 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103647997447 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512957551291 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.