Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Given that the dire economic circumstances in many societies, deciding on which part of the society should give more support is very challenging. Some people hold a negative perspective toward any assistance from the government for supporting artists, while others believe that sports teams don’t require additional support from the government. I subscribe to this group, and I think artists deserve to get more funds.
To begin with, art could be a very great source for the whole society to alleviate their stress and anxiety by use of it. In fact, with any financial support from the government in the art works, the majority of the society, even, with low income would have the chance of contributing to art, which leads to a more tranquil and peaceful society. As an illustration, with the government’s help for music bands, the concert tickets will cost lower than usual. As a result, everyone could afford to be in those concerts, and enjoy live music instead of staying at home and watching music from television. This could provide a low-cost source of entertainment which is lucrative for families to have delightful moments together. This example demonstrates how it is important that the government should focus on the art field, in order to have a happier society.
Moreover, many private sponsors comply to support sports teams, which is beneficial for both the sports team and the sponsor. In this case, the government should not consider spending money on those teams. For instance, all the football teams in my country, Iran, have a corporation to financially support them. The corporation’s logo is printed on the athlete’s shirt which is a kind of advertisement, and reciprocally they spend money on that team to thrive. The football team has received all kinds of champions they need, the hotel for their practice trips, their extra clothes, and so forth. Hence, no concern remained for the government to pay attention to.
To put it in a nutshell, I firmly believe that artists need more monetary support from the government than athletics. With more assistant given to art works, the majority of people in the society could enjoy them and release their pressures. In addition, it is not of necessity that the government spends money on athletes because many local and private companies give the required support to the sports teams.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 58
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Some believe that local communities should rely on citizen volunteers for projects benefiting those communities e g organizing youth sports leagues and collecting donations for charity Others believe that local communities are better served when professio 54
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, moreover, so, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07179487179 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77210202525 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8356778819 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.888888889 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290945411387 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920175610428 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573192270512 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191042482235 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343178993229 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.