Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
One of the most important tasks of governments is how to allocate the national budget to public matters such as social health, educational system, athletes, and defense. Society is often divided on the priorities of governmental expenses. For example, whereas some prefer that the state supports arts, others believe that national athletic teams deserve more public supports. I believe that the government should sponsor athletic activities more than arts. There are three reasons why I subscribe to this idea which are separately elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, national athletic achievements can affect society very positively. Each victory or success raises the sense of pride in people and makes them believe more in their abilities. On the contrary, defeats can affect the citizens in a bad way. It can decrease their hope and grow some anger inside them. Thus, these bad feelings have harmful effects on the way people interact with each other in different places, such as school, university, or workplaces. In addition, athletic victories bring lots of social happiness among people. Take a personal experience as an example, I clearly remember the year 1997 when our national football team defeated Australia to be qualified for the world cup 1998 held in France. That unexpected victory brought people to the streets to celebrate until midnight. All over the country, there were talks about the achievement and the player that scored the final goal gained huge popularity that no one before and after gained. That event and its later consequences learned me the importance of sport in our societies.
Second, athletic activities are followed by a bigger part of society. It is more widespread through people. So, any investment in developing these activities from the government benefits more people. To explain more, art is more exclusive and has a more limited body of special fans, often at highly educated levels. As a result, spending more on this special interest leads to cover fewer people. This idea easily can be examined if you compare the viewers of a football game with those who attend a theater or go to movies or art performances, whether they are shown on television or in halls and stadiums. Government should consider the amount of benefited people in allocating the public budget.
Third, success in athletic competitions like the world cup or Olympics can portray a country very well. For example, the large number of medals achieved by American athletics in Olympic games, raise a sense of compliment in other countries. As a real example, wrestling fans in my country, Iran, like the American wrestler Jordan Boroughs very much because of his unique style and a bunch of his gold medals.
In conclusion, I suggest that the state spend as much as possible to improve the country's national athletic achievements. I feel this way because athletic activities have stronger effects on society's health and happiness. Furthermore, more citizens attend athletic tasks than art practices. Finally, this investment has a great effect on rising the country's status around the globe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ntrary, defeats can affect the citizens in a bad way. It can decrease their hope and grow so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, second, so, third, thus, well, whereas, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2618.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20477137177 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69592327859 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574552683897 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1179099762 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.275862069 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3448275862 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75862068966 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204554098924 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048334750995 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516060886993 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107720300198 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581720685436 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ntrary, defeats can affect the citizens in a bad way. It can decrease their hope and grow so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, second, so, third, thus, well, whereas, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2618.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20477137177 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69592327859 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574552683897 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1179099762 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.275862069 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3448275862 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75862068966 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204554098924 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048334750995 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516060886993 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107720300198 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581720685436 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.