Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Today, access to different sources of news is a necessary factor for people who live in complicated societies. Each person has an inclination toward issues happening in society and listening to the news can affect these attitudes. Some news are in your favorite, whereas some others may be against your belief. I agree with the idea that people should listen to news presented from a different point of view. There are two reasons why I subscribe to this idea, which are separately elaborated upon in the following essay.
First, listening to different opinions will correct our decisions positively. If people always hear in favor of their points, it will strengthen their ideas to finally form a hard belief in their minds, which is now very hard to change. By taking into consideration that nothing is absolutely right, people need to regularly correct their views to do not deviate from norms severely. This is possible just by considering the opposite side of views because they try to show you your weaknesses or any points out of your consideration. As an example, if citizens who want to vote just listen to the advertisements of one party and do not consider the other's points, it is likely that they make a biased choice. It is better if they first listen carefully to both sides, then decide which one deserves their votes.
Second, by looking at others' perspectives, people will be able to detect their faults and weaknesses. To explain more, whereas opposite points can challenge our thoughts and compel us to think more deeply about our understandings, consented views just amplify our beliefs. This amplification can lead us to be fanatic hard-minded person who is unable to discuss correctly. A fanatic citizen is a potent threat to society and needs immediate remediation to prevent further damages. Therefore, people should always keep themselves in contact with different points of view, because it is beneficial for them and their society. As an instance, fundamentalism usually grows in closed societies where the ruler or the state blockages the free circulation of information. Consequently, a typical belief gains the opportunity to obsess people's minds in order to convert them to mindless supporters.
To sum up, I think that watching or listening to all different views in society is very beneficial for both individuals and society as a whole. This is because opposite opinions open up our eyes and help us to decide and behave better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- Tpo 54 integrated 86
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage 3
- tpo 63 integrated 63
- Do you agree or disagree with this opinion Advertising influences people s behavior in a negative way 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, if, look, may, second, so, then, therefore, whereas, as to, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05147058824 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83387499911 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55637254902 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3645465326 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.05 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190107909819 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572039269153 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715650124771 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1176675701 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684305908235 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.