Education, the founding stone of a country’s prosperity, has been valued and even triggers a heated debate over whether the government should allow all children to attend preschool at no cost to their families. In some people’s views, the national or state committee should charge fees for such programs. However, from my perspective, attending preschool for free is non-trivial, which benefits children’s social networks and parents’ economic condition.
The administration should prioritize providing opportunities for kids to attend preschool courses without charging tuition fees. It is conducive to placing children as beneficiaries in their social bonds by facilitating them to make new friends. To begin with, if the authority makes attending preschool without charge for children, less-privileged families will be able to send their children to the program without costing money. Then it is likely that the number of children who attend preschool will increase. Thus, the children could encounter more peers and thus increase the possibility of finding friends with the same hobbies and matched dispositions. On the other hand, if the early education program is costly, certain families in financial dilemma can hardly afford it and are unwilling to send their children to the program of early education, considering the program’s cost-effect. Under such circumstances, the number of kids in preschool might be too limited for children to socialize and hang out with a bunch of friends.
What should be equally worth discussing is that free preschool programs would benefit children’s parents financially by providing a free platform to help look after their kids. Three-year-old children always need to be supervised by their parents. Kids are naughty and
curious about everything, so they usually risk hurting themselves in ways they might be unaware of, such as playing with fire and climbing up to the windows. That means parents must invest time and money to accompany them. For example, one parent may need to quit the job to look after the kids. Losing one source of income might devastate the lives of poverty-stricken families, deteriorating their monetary condition. The authorities can mitigate such financial problems by enabling free early education. Such a program provides a platform for professional educators to attend to the children. Thus, it would be a promising budget for parents and help them reduce expenditure. On the contrary, will such an economic advantage be provided if the council charges for the preschool program?
To conclude, only by rendering preschool programs for free, instead of charging money, can children and their parents reap the maximum benefits.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country 73
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing It is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with this idea 90
- Which one do you think is the most important factor for a student to success at college or university 1 Tutors in university2 The encouragement from family and friends3 High quality education from high school 76
- When your professor wants you to learn in a short time which is better working in a group or alone 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 76
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'place'?
Suggestion: place
...arging tuition fees. It is conducive to placing children as beneficiaries in their soci...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by their parents. Kids are naughty and curious about everything, so they usuall...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, for example, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49642004773 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99733972574 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55369928401 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0799126927 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414455363697 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129250824337 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847209341563 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237496790963 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869232196908 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'place'?
Suggestion: place
...arging tuition fees. It is conducive to placing children as beneficiaries in their soci...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by their parents. Kids are naughty and curious about everything, so they usuall...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, for example, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49642004773 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99733972574 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55369928401 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0799126927 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414455363697 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129250824337 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847209341563 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237496790963 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869232196908 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.