Education, the founding stone of a country’s prosperity, has been valued and even triggers a heated debate over whether the government should allow all children to attend preschool at no cost to their families. In some people’s views, the government should charge fees for such programs. Contrary to these people’s opinions is, my perspective that attending preschool for free will benefit children’s social networks and parents’ economic condition.
The administration should prioritise providing opportunities for kids to attend preschool courses without charging tuition fees. It would place children as beneficiaries in their social bonds by facilitating them to make new friends. To begin with, if the government makes attending preschool at no cost for children, less-privileged families could send their children to the program without costing money. Then it is likely that the number of children who attend preschool would increase. Thus, the children could encounter more peers and thus increase the possibility of finding friends with the same hobbies. On the other hand, if the government charges fees, certain families in poverty can hardly afford it or are unwilling to send their children to preschool, considering the program’s cost-effect. Under such circumstances, the number of kids in preschool might be too limited for children to make more friends.
What should be equally worth discussing is that free preschool programs would benefit children’s parents financially by providing a free platform to help look after their kids. Three-year-old children always need to be supervised by their parents because kids are naughty and usually, driven by curiosity, place themselves in danger, such as by playing fire. That means parents must invest time and money to care for them. For example, a mother may need to quit the job to look after the kids or hire a nurse, which is money-consuming. The government can mitigate such financial problems by providing free preschool education. Such a program provides a platform for teachers or other staff to look after the children. Thus, it would be a promising budget for parents and help them save money. On the contrary, will such economic benefit be provided if the administration charges for the preschool program?
To conclude, only by rendering preschool programs for free, instead of charging money, can children and their parents reap the maximum benefits.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 73
- Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, then, thus, for example, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45382585752 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96970358491 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517150395778 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7852351188 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.789473684 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422820319703 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147064966253 0.076458572812 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833000342141 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275229344254 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885069626953 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.