Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you

Courses, the founding stone of students' academic learning, have been valued and even trigger heated discussions. Some people argue that students should take courses with professors whose classes they have never taken before. Contrary to these people's views is my perspective that we should take courses taught by professors with whom we have already had other classes during our past years of study, which contributes to our learning efficiency and academic research.

What should be prioritized is that we should enroll courses taught by familiar teachers, compared wih courses educated by strange professors, we can improve our learning productivity. After attending to the professor's other courses, we will be familiar with his pedagogical tactics, such as his speaking speed and the time spent on answering questions. By knowing the professor's teaching strategies, we can have better preperation for the courses. For example, if the professor speak fastly, making us hard to follow, we can review the textbook and scrutinize the concepts beforehand, which can help mitigate the situation and facilitate us to master the subject. Therefore, our productivity may increase. On the contrary, if we take the courses educated by professors we do not know, we may find it arduous to adapt to their teaching method, which is detrimental for our efficiency.

What should be equally worth discussing is that learning with professor, who we have already acquaintant with, is conducive to our research achievement. In the university, if we have strong interest to a research topic conducted by a certain professor, we can take initiative to join the group. This motivation is based on the fact that one has already had deep understanding into a professor's research interest and also know about his personality. To a certain extend, only by taking more course taught by a certain professor can be have these insights. Thus, taking courses taught by familiar professors could provide us with information relating to the professor's disposition and research thesis. Take me as an example. Professor Zeng was the teacher of Introduction of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. I took the first course when I was a freshman and then I continued to take the second course in my second year. After continuously taking these two courses, I was intrigued by the magic of the AI and knew Prof. Zeng is a preminent researcher. Then I joined his lab and finally I had a publication on a well-known AI journal.

To conclude, only by taking courses conducted by familiar professors, can we be more productive and have an excellent research opportunity.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...now about his personality. To a certain extend, only by taking more course taught by a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ide us with information relating to the professors disposition and research thesis. Take m...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23058823529 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98332528528 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503529411765 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2118164092 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2380952381 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249852156143 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841959137398 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700731972006 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169831743761 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809463184648 0.0645574589148 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...now about his personality. To a certain extend, only by taking more course taught by a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ide us with information relating to the professors disposition and research thesis. Take m...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23058823529 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98332528528 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503529411765 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2118164092 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2380952381 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249852156143 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841959137398 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700731972006 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169831743761 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809463184648 0.0645574589148 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.