Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many people think that government should spend money on the development of technology and internet access in particular. Although I understand their point of view, I have a different opinion. Personally, I believe that government should support public transportation financially.
First, the government should support the expanding of a public transportation system in The United States of America. One of the reason is that because of this expansion would improve people's lives and give them the freedom of everyday walking to places they intended to such as visit doctor offices, go to the markets or visit their families. A recent announcement in Houston newspaper about the construction of bullet train between Houston and Dalles, Texas. If the train's construction happened earlier, it would ease locals to finds jobs and commute to collages between these cities. Some people say that public transportation is slow, sometimes unsafe. Despite that, still public transportation convenient for many citizens. Because of this, it is necessary for the government to develop the public transportation networks and it's modes.
Second, the development of the facilities of the public transportation would reduce the carbon footprints. Because of the use of transient services such as metros, trollies and buses would reduce streets congestions. As a result, this would decrease the number of cars that cause carbon emission in the air. Also, it is critical to remember that the developing of public transportation modes would reduce the gasoline consumptions each year. If one household operated one car rather than two and switched to public transient services, it would save gasoline expenses around 9,000 dollars approximately per year. Although some people argue that even public transportation are harmful to the environment, many public transportation modes work on electric power such modes would cause less harm to the environment. Because of this, it is the best for the government to assist in the development of public transportation systems.
In conclusion, supporting public transportation facilities is necessary for many potential reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-07 | thichngaodu27 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port public transportation financially. First, the government should support the...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 469, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trains'' or 'train's'?
Suggestion: trains'; train's
...tween Houston and Dalles, Texas. If the trains construction happened earlier, it would...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsportation networks and its modes. Second, the development of the facilitie...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, still, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61585365854 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13673140046 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521341463415 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9593294216 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995587217126 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412989190996 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595872887228 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089745768477 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488059040644 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.