Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Being the leader of a group gives people a myriad of amenities, such as particular social status and feeling of success. However, I personally think that it is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. The reasons I hold this stance will be elaborated in the paragraphs bellow.
One of the reasons is that a member of a group has fewer responsibilities. The member has assigned duties and must follow them. After performing job`s commitments the member can be free and enjoy his live. Moreover, nowadays, employers do not like their regular workers to work overtime, which means that when the shift is over they have to clock out and live the work`s environment. If the member of the team stays late at work, he can be punished. Conversely, the leader very often required to work overtime to get all projects done, which is indispensable in case to keep the job. To that end, a member of a group has more free time to devote it to enjoyable things.
Another reason is that life of a regular member of a group is not so stressful. The member does not have to think about results of the team`s work in the degree that the leader does. The leader crafts projects and ensure the time frame to accomplish them. If the group fails to attain the goal, most of the time the leader is liable for the drawback, but not the members. Although in the group everybody has to be concerned of the team`s success, not everyone performs his duty in appropriate manner. So, life of the leader is sometimes very complicated and full of emotional discomfort.
To recapitulate, I feel that it is more advantageous to be a member of a group than to be the leader. This is because the member has more free time to enjoy life and do not exposed to stress as much as the leader does. All things considered it is reasonable to assume that it is better to be a regular member of a team.
- What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways, or on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons to develop your essay. 73
- You have the opportunity to visit a foregn country for two weeks. Which country would you like to visit? Use spesiifc reasons and details to explain your choice. 70
- If food tastes good it is probably bad for you How far do you agree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, moreover, so, as to, i feel, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46991404011 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68406597275 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458452722063 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5945828688 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1052631579 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47368421053 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365369861149 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132095276084 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106534838928 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269130910981 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844634139778 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.