A person’s profession should depend on their own willingness to pursue a path, not their parents’. At the end of the day, it would be best to choose a job that is desirable to you. However, if it happens to be that, your career choice aligns with your parents’ career, there would be benefits. Hence, I agree that it would be good for a child to go through a similar path as his/her parents, because following the footsteps of your parents offers you an abundance of benefits. However, it is important that your choice is not based solely on that aspect.
Experience is a major facet of a good worker that can only be acquired with time and participation. Since your parents have gone through working in the specific job, they can share the knowledge they have gained and elucidate you on things that can only be learned from people who have gone through working in the specific job. These things are priceless and could be of great use. With the knowledge you have acquired, you would have better control over situations you encounter in the job as your parents may have prepared you for the several outcomes they have encountered in the past.
Another reason is the inheritance. If for instance, your family owned a business and you choose to follow in their footsteps, the occupation can be passed down onto you. You would continue the legacy of your own blood which some families hold very dearly to their heart. This comes with several advantages too, such as, not having to start over. If the business is already up and running, you do not have to go through the hassle of starting from scratch.
In conclusion, there are immense benefits to having the same occupation as your parents, such as the knowledge and legacy being passed onto you, but it would only benefit you if it is what you want to do, because at the end of the day, it is your life and what you will be doing for the rest of your years. I believe your choice should not be based merely on this aspect.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Success comes from possessing money and power Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 75
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A person should never make an important decision alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 100
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56424581006 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40534422618 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474860335196 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3561253552 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201803372115 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703994149603 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442483147211 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136981794346 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208542567782 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.