With ongoing rapid urbanization, a growing number of people begin to move to the city because of better infrastructure or employment opportunities. Some people claim that there are no drawbacks living in metropolitan areas, while others do not agree. From my perspective, some groups of people, especially children, are not suitable for living in the city in the long run.
Undeniably, whether it is education, medical care or technology, bigger cities always have everything. First of all, there are more high-quality schools in cities than in the countryside. Better education for children is vitally important because this gives each child more chances to get admitted to a desirable university to some extent. Second, cities are equipped with more reliable services and support for our daily life, such as hospitals. This means that children who have a relatively poor immune system can get an immediate and efficient treatment. Third, cities allow children easy access to cutting-edge items. This means that children can have a broader view of the world. However, this does not mean that children should grow up in metropolitan areas.
In fact, children can have some irreplaceable advantages to living in the countryside. To begin with, the natural environment provided by suburbs plays a crucial role in children’s physical and mental health. For instance, researchers at the University of Illinois discovered that the time children spend in the woods could be used to supplement treatment of ADD, which is an intractable disease among children. Moreover, because of air pollution and unhealthy lifestyle, many children are suffering from chronic diseases, such as asthma, diabetes and obesity. Once they get these diseases, it will be extremely difficult to cure, and will cost a lot of money. Therefore, in order to prevent children from suffering those diseases, a better option is to let children live in the countryside where they can enjoy a pollution-free environment and have enough room to do exercise. In addition, growing up in the countryside helps to foster children’s intelligence. For example, a study at the University of Kansas found that adolescents who backpacked for three days showed higher creativity and ability to think.
In conclusion, both of these two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that children should grow up in suburban areas. This is mainly due to the fact that the environment provided by the countryside is essential for children’s physical and mental health, and these surroundings are almost impossible to be replaced by cities.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). 89
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles. 78
- With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people be looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 100
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What causes of the increased demand and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to this pr 84
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30508474576 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00166748328 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556900726392 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8233932497 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52380952381 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233028687205 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071494749183 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402746555619 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143090498674 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216379951104 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.