In recent years, there has been considerable discussion on the causes of extravagant wedding ceremonies. This trend is ascribed to two factors and I think it is a negative development.
There are two reasons why modern marriage is bigger and more expensive than in the past. To begin with, people are richer than before. For example, with the development of economy and education, people have more incomes, so they have more money to hold a better wedding ceremony. In addition, people value the quality of life. Compared with people in the past, modern people live a wealthier life, so they care more about the happiness and rituals. Because of these two factors, marriages are much better than those in the past.
I think this trend is a negative development because holding extravagant wedding ceremonies will make poor people suffer considerable stress. For instance, following this social trend, a new couple who is going get married must get enough money to hold a big and expensive wedding ceremony. On the one hand, if this couple has some savings, they have no choice but to spend all of them on their marriage; therefore, they will have no money left for their lives. On the other hand, a couple without any savings will face much more difficult situations because they have to borrow more money from families or banks. However, it is likely that they are not able to pay back the money and thus fall into huge debt.
In conclusion, the tendency towards holding bigger and more expensive marriages is caused by the improvement of people’s material life and their emphasis on the life quality. However, this trend has a negative impact on society, especially poor people. Therefore, this practice should not be encouraged.
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think it is a positive or negative development 95
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same numbers of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- International tourism is now more common than ever before Some feel that this is a positive trend while others do not 89
- The graph shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95890410959 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59800398288 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534246575342 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7651654387 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268164938584 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094490729071 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102563542962 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156045893413 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733011846881 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.