Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The 20th and 21th centuries are characterized by all the momentous changes, which have been made in human's lives. Perhaps the most significant milestone of these two centuries is the development of science and technology. Nowadays, invent and the advent of vast majorities of new sciences have increased drastically since they have become more perplexing and intricate. Stemming from this fact, a relevant question that is a moot point is whether learning wide variety of knowledge could broaden our horizon or we should stay focus on a specific field. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that if people concentrate on one material, not only can they become a specialist in that field but also learn completely and meticulously. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, there is no doubt that a plethora of people bend over backward and make an effort to enhance their knowledge and education in every given society. Indeed, knowledge and education are of utmost important goal for every mature human being. Generally phrased, there are myriads of fields that individuals can learn about them but being curious and interested in learning various subjects might create some difficulties for humans. As a vivid example, when people are assigned to do a task, they can concentrate on the task and do it vigorously without being distracted by the presence of other works. In this way, not only can you carry out your duties with a sense of assurances but also can feel honored and satisfaction. To elucidate more on this issue, learn about different subjects can make you anxious and distress and not allow you to stay focus. Learning about one specific subject can guarantee your success and patronize you to reach the pinnacle of your days.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that if people stay with one subjects, they can think wisely and deeply and not to do something wrong. To put it in other words, different knowledge and tasks will definitely preoccupy people minds and do not provide an opportunity for human beings to think widely. Going into the depth, one academic subject will, indeed, make humans decide their path and expand their skills in one task. However, having more knowledge in the different realm will not restrict individuals' minds and provide fertile ground for them to accumulate various information about different knowledge. In fact, have a broad knowledge will provide fertile ground for people to rise up their experiences and in some case, become familiar with crowds of other people and socialize.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
- "A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the Endure p 66
- Do you prefer to live in an apartment or in a dormitory at university? 76
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 83
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The 20th and 21th centuries are characterized by all the m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in fact, no doubt, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08149779736 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6951722223 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533039647577 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6120671722 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.35 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198876478136 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575870432916 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482524349192 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106892197661 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476611347308 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.