Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is commonly believed that in life, success is not the most important thing; it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail.
The most important thing in a career has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion that holds it more important to remain happy and optimistic when experiencing failures. This paper will elucidate the reasons why I am in favor of this opinion. On one hand, job satisfaction is what I consider a crucial factor. It is noteworthy that remaining happy and optimistic while experiencing failures is synonymous with accepting their current capabilities positively and define failing as the chance to broadening horizons and deepening knowledge. Thanks to this, people are likely to have a solid foundation of knowledge. Accordingly, they are capable of finding and understanding their problems precisely. With this in mind, they stand a golden chance to ameliorate the qualities and abilities to make independent judgments and to solve problems better. Eventually, this probably gives rise to job contentment. More notably, while people are remaining happy and optimistic while they failing, focus on learning from their mortifying failures is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for them to internalize self-discipline and responsibility. On the ground of that, they can be endowed with a proclivity for purposeful action. During this process, they are prone to enhance the quality and the production capacity of their work. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for them to increase their work performance and job satisfaction. Given these points, remaining optimistic while we failing greatly contributes to job satisfaction.
On the other hand, some people express a different view that success is the most important thing because remaining happy after unsatisfactory work is just a meaningless complacent, which impedes them from recognizing their strenuous efforts to achieve their goals. As a consequence, it creates a huge burden on job happiness. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. People have already well thought about the benefits of remaining optimistic when they fail. Incidentally, there is a certain purposefulness about having indefatigable patience. For example, becoming a successful scientist requires us to have indefatigable patience and optimism. To exemplify, while researching pharmaceutical products, it would be an extremely long path to generate the medicine that is guaranteed in safety and utility for consumers. Undoubtedly, people who always want to succeed in a short period or who usually show a lackadaisical attitude after experiencing failures will never succeed in the scientific field or even in plenty of job fields such as business, law, sociology, archelogy, or history, etc. Therefore, it is unlikely that remaining happy and optimistic when they fail prevents them from successively done something meaningful in their career.
Another point often overlooked is that even if meaningless complacency does exist, it should be considered as the chance for them to keep great motivation and nurture a harmonious combination of mind and body. By the same token, they have an incentive to have a high-quality experience. Under this, they have been allowed to find the inspiration to become a more creative person, which creates a significant impact on their current capabilities. Beyond the shadow of a doubt, they tend to build their unique sense of values and be recognized for their creativeness. This, indeed, empowers them to get satisfaction out of realizing themselves develop and reach some of their goals and abilities. By and large, people should put off the idea that remaining happy prevents them from achieving satisfactory results in career.
In summary, job satisfaction is the convincing reason for my approval. I hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding the most crucial thing in a career.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-13 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
2023-07-13 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 83 | view |
2022-11-30 | joyce05 | 70 | view |
2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 86 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement As modern life gets more and more complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees 83
- Which do you prefer to buy new technological devices immediately after they become available or to wait till many people have adopted accepted and started to use them 70
- People should take time to relax with hobbies or physical activities that very different from what they do at work 73
- Which do you prefer to buy new technological devices immediately after they become available or to wait till many people have adopted accepted and started to use them 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., sociology, archelogy, or history, etc. Therefore, it is unlikely that remaining...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, incidentally, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in summary, such as, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3318.0 1977.66487455 168% => OK
No of words: 611.0 407.700716846 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43044189853 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1754222276 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 212.727598566 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520458265139 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 1054.8 618.680645161 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1787656587 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6875 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.09375 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15625 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 27.0 11.8709677419 227% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174246883317 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045905587332 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690526621641 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101238045154 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664732274999 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 174.0 86.8835125448 200% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.