Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents should set strict rules to their children if they want them to succeed in the future
The way for children to succeed in the future has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion that holds parents should set strict rules for their children if they want them to succeed in the future. This paper will elucidate the reasons why I am in favor of this opinion.
On one hand, career success is what I consider a crucial factor. It is noteworthy that setting strict rules for children is synonymous with being taught and raised by their parents meticulously. Thanks to this, children are likely to learn from their mortifying failures and reflect on themselves again. Accordingly, they are capable of recognizing their strength and weakness, which is one of the most important criteria in self-assessment. With this in mind, they stand a golden chance to make themselves better in many aspects. Eventually, this probably gives rise to achieving satisfactory results in both the academic field and life-skill field. More notably, while children are raised by strict rules, obtaining a chance to accustomed to good habits is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for them to ameliorate their health condition. On the ground of that, it is possible for them to be more energetic and inspired in daily activities such as studying, helping their parents, or enjoying sports with their friends. During this process, they are prone to working with higher efficiency and accuracy. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for them to be self-assured person, who have tendencies to done multitudinous tasks successively in plenty of situations.
On the other hand, some people express a different view that setting strict rules for children deprives kids of the opportunity to internalize self-discipline and responsibility. As a consequence, the kids grow up with animosity towards their parents instead of love. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. Parents have already well thought about the education style. Incidentally, every parent owns an idiosyncratic style of education that was purposeful and well-fitted with the characteristics of the children. Therefore, it is unlikely that setting strict rules prevents young ages from having the opportunity to internalize self-discipline and responsibility. Another point often overlooked is that even if the discouragement to internalize self-discipline does exist, it should be considered as the chance for them to accumulate more fundamental social skills. By the same token, children have an incentive to behave ethically in any relationship. By virtue of this, children are given the opportunity to gain more appreciation from people around them, which creates a significant impact on their relationships. Beyond any doubt, their worthwhile endeavor bring about a dramatic change to their behavior towards to positive direction. This, indeed, empowers the children to get more assistance that can help them in many aspects. For instance, finishing multitudinous tasks with higher efficiency and productivity, eliminating a sesquipedalian way of solving problems, and enhancing more inspiration and motivation in their daily life. By and large, people should put off the idea that setting strict regulations for children prevents them from growing up with love towards their children.
In summary, career accomplishment is the convincing reason for my approval. It is my hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding the way for children to succeed in the future
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Modern agriculture does damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Modern agriculture does damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 71
- Which do you prefer to buy new technological devices immediately after they become available or to wait till many people have adopted accepted and started to use them 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, incidentally, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in summary, such as, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3033.0 1977.66487455 153% => OK
No of words: 562.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39679715302 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16318112769 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514234875445 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 943.2 618.680645161 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0743637011 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.586206897 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3793103448 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55172413793 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 11.8709677419 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326284101463 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891999866299 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912738072747 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209860179409 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901324745745 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.