Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (liked by students) and effective in helping students in learning. Give reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
As an inseparable part of education-oriented civilizations, education is inextricably intertwined with people's lives. Some people subscribe to the view that teachers should be either popular among students or effective in helping them in learning. As far as I am concerned, I personally believe that in this day and age, it is easy for teachers to be popular and effective as well.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that social networks pave the way for teachers to provide intimate and efficient classes for students. It is hard to overlook the crucial influence of social media such as Facebook, Tweeter and other user-friendly applications on today’s people lives, especially on schools as an important part of the society. Social networks provide an exclusive atmosphere for teachers to increase their classes productivity. To be more specific, students and teachers can be in close contact with each other day-in-day-out around the clock; therefore, they can have a better understanding of each other which positively affect the class efficiency. Furthermore, teachers can set up a special group for their students to send them their homework regularly and explain their difficulties if they have in solving the problems. As a case in point, I vividly remember, when I was in high school, I had a hard time dealing with math problems, and the books were very difficult for me. After one month when all students complained about the difficulties of the homework, out teacher established a math group for us to join in order to have an opportunity to ask our questions when we were doing our homework. Not to mention about the effectiveness of that group that it really revolutionized my math grade. As a matter of fact, this group not only does help us to have a better understanding of the math, but also provides a situation for us to have a good feeling to our teacher. Hence, my personal experience competently corroborates the fact that social media helps students and teachers to have an effective class in the warm environment, which is beneficial for either party.
By the same token, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that new technology offers a wide assortment of new technics for teachers to have the efficient-cordial classes. It goes without saying that new technology provides a variegated stream of new approaches for teaching. From psychological perspectives, there are various new methods that not only do learn teachers to provide a friendly setting for students to learn, but also help them to train students in the way that the lessons never get faded in their minds. It is axiomatic that new empirical with experimental practices methods in learning which we heard a lot in these days are of these breakthroughs. Performing different tasks by students and the teacher provides a warm and friendly situation for the teacher to talk in a more intimate way, so they can have a closer relation. For example, tracing back to four years ago, when I was attending university. I had a memorable class that always held in a lab setting, which really helps us to extend our knowledge due to the fact that we never forgot the experimental results we gained through different lessons. Besides, carrying out the tasks with our teacher allows us to have a closer relationship with him. Hence, these worthwhile experience shed some light on the view that new methods offer by the progressing technology enables teachers to have the friendly and efficient class and at the same.
By and large, according to the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly agree with this standpoint that teachers can manage efficiency and intimacy of theirs classes easily. It is suggested that more teacher strive to provide the efficient-intimate classes for students for the sake of the more students have a friendly atmosphere in their classes, the better they learn their courses.
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 76
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 73
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 70
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 73
- Independent Writing Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing sports can teach people lessons about life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, by and large, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3266.0 1977.66487455 165% => OK
No of words: 643.0 407.700716846 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07931570762 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.03561760524 4.48103885553 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06280822865 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 212.727598566 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46034214619 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1002.6 618.680645161 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1643914903 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.083333333 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7916666667 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95833333333 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23344075782 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771095065782 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562083607204 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169991021949 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369247125575 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.