Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is a good idea to sometimes stop reading and listening to news for a period of few days or weeks.
It is incontrovertible that reading and listening to news plays a crucial role in our lives leading us to have a better life. Yet, there could be a debate over whether it is better to stop listening and reading to news for a while or not. Some might argue that people should stop reading and listening to the news at least for a few weeks. However, I strongly believe that we should always read and listen to them for two reasons.
To begin with, in this way, we can always keep up with the times, which is benefit to us. In fact, technology is constantly being improved; thus, if we want to know everything about that, we should never stop reading and listening to them. From my personal experience, I decided not to listen to the news, while in high school. This was because I made up my mind to just concentrate on my studies and do well in my exams. After a while, all my classmates are head and shoulders above me in terms of technology associated with the cellphone, that is, they knew some new information that I did not know the first thing about. Soon, I realized that I was on the wrong track falling behind them. This clearly depicts that had I not stopped listening and reading to news, I would not have fallen back behind my classmates.
Another major consideration is that gaining knowledge from news helps us be more creative in our lives. This means that if we are aware of every news, we know more about our interesting matters, with the result that we are more creative and can do our job to the best of our abilities. To illustrate this, one should see no further than listening and reading news in our leisure time. There are many famous researchers in the habit of listening to the news, and they are making a lot of progress in their social and professional lives. This is because they try to learn all the ropes; hence, they never lose touch with news, i.e., obtaining knowledge from the news is a matter of life and death for them.
In summary, there are numerous reasons to believe that we must never lose touch with the news. This will allow us to obtain acquire knowledge in order to keep up with other people and be more productive and imaginative in our lives.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is easier to become an educated person now than it was in the past 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is a good idea to sometimes stop reading and listening to news for a period of few days or weeks 66
- Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks Whic 73
- Which of the following ways is the best for early education of children aged 3 to 6 Preparing written books for them to read Reading loudly to them Communicating with them 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television programs should present stories in which good people are rewarded and bad people are punished 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is incontrovertible that reading and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and listen to them for two reasons. To begin with, in this way, we can alway...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve fallen back behind my classmates. Another major consideration is that gain...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a matter of life and death for them. In summary, there are numerous reasons t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, at least, in fact, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46153846154 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43454795572 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488833746898 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7945526582 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8888888889 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220331034211 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832014324115 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560253959893 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146272148151 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070204581708 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.