Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for the government to provide money for beautiful things and not just for practical things.
Beautiful things refer to those things that are more aesthetically pleasing and meet people’s need beyond basic level, like the city landscape, recreational park, art gallery. I concur with the idea that government should invest money for beautiful things rather spend all of it on practical and basic stuffs, so as to satisfy citizens need beyond useful, build edges in attracting more skillful workers, and mitigate current condition.
Beautiful things can satisfy people higher need. As the galloping development of the domestic economy, many households in the city become richer or enter the threshold of middle class. Many of these middle families have no worry about food and other basic and particle things. However, as they their basic needs are met already, they are new in need of higher satisfaction like art, recreational facilities. As the government invests to build a beautiful not so practical gallery, citizens can enter the gallery to appreciate the amazing masterpieces and have clam down their mind; as they build a theater, people can listen to the great plays by Shakespeare and release their stress; and also as they design a green park, people can get a little close to the nature and escape the bustle and hustle in the city.
Things that are beyond practical can attract more labors to the city. Creating more beautiful things can improve the image of the city, creating a better living condition and allure more skillful workers to immigrate to here. Nowadays, the competitions between cities are also fierce, as most of the cities have met many people’s basic needs. Winners come beyond creating practical things, rather lie in beautiful things. Supposed, a city spends a million dollars to renovate its old streets, plant more trees, building more green parks, and erecting a few more theaters. Compared to the city that just have basic stuffs like public transportation, mail service, it has more competitive edges on attracting more skillful workers. And those immigrates can in turn create far more than one million dollars that they initially invest. Therefore, government can create more fortune by building more beautiful things.
Beautiful things are not so lucrative and may not have a lot of investors. Generally, those beautiful things have less evident benefits and bring money in a long term many companies and private organizations will steer away from them. Many cities are in lack of those beauty and people lead a boring life. Government has more income than many companies, they have the capability to build these unpractical things. Also, it is the government should take the responsibility to create more beauty in the city and better lives for its citizens. Therefore, if citizens are craving for a new gallery. However, building it may cost millions of dollars and it receives little avenue back from selling tickets. It is time for government to take responsibility.
In conclusion, I am deeply convinced that government should invest in the beautiful things other than practical things, as this can meet people’s higher needs, allure more immigrants, and reverse recent awful situation.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for the government to provide money for beautiful things and not just for practical things. 73
- Which one is the most important for teacher of high school?1.The ability to help students plan for their future;2.The ability to find the students who need help most and help them3.Teach students how to learn outside of the class. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ll of it on practical and basic stuffs, so as to satisfy citizens need beyond useful, bu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this beauty' or 'those beauties'?
Suggestion: this beauty; those beauties
...y from them. Many cities are in lack of those beauty and people lead a boring life. Governme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2660.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23622047244 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72691444166 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468503937008 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.5485063256 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45833333333 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18744328405 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704590018756 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645476912322 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127784481334 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633793273077 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.