Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations.
Throughout history, human interference in nature has caused some species to be extinct, which has had deleterious effects on the environment. From my perspective, now it is time to compensate, and it should have of significant importance for the government to conserve the wildlife. There are numerous reasons to support my opinion, among which two stand out.
First and foremost, the government should protect wild animals in order to keep nature balanced. Clearly, biodiversity has of a significant role to play in our nature. It should be noted that all species depend on each other in the world. Consider a predator eats their prey, and the same predator is eaten by another animal, which, in turn, causes nature to become balanced. Therefore, this process ends up with us, and humankind gets influenced by other species extinction as well. For example, when human beings started to hunt a certain type of fox, it caused an increased population of rabbits and rats. After raising the population of rats and rabbits, they invaded the agricultural yield and reduced the number of food people needed, which, in turn, caused the price of foods to increase. As a result, if people want to have a stable life, they must conserve all the species around the globe.
Second, by conserving the wilderness, the government helps to convey these treasure assets intact to the next generation. To be more specific, people in the future will need this species for several reasons. One of the usage of this wildlife for the next generation is that they can exploit these assets as a source of income. They can establish the Natural Park or different entertainment for people to earn money from them. Another application is that thanks to the development of technologies they will do some experiments on the different species to know the nature better in future which helps them to improve their knowledge and information. For instance, we have little knowledge about life underwater now, and when the government supports wildlife preservation, the marine animal stays intact that people can do their experiments in the future. Consequently, not only is it a moral issue to preserve the wild animals, but also we could transfer this asset to the next generation intact.
To sum up, considering the reasons and the examples mentioned above, the government should maintain the wilderness for future societies. This is because not only does their extinction affect humankind as well, but the next generation also has right to have these invaluable assets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-16 | ehsanghoflsaz | 76 | view |
| 2020-06-26 | hesam_75 | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | javadsafari | 90 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | javadsafari | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | Mehran-mech.90 | 81 | view |
- Today many employers are looking for various sources of information to understand job applicants better Which is the best way for the employers to better know the situation of a job applicant Contacting previous employers checking the job applicant s prof 70
- if you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 66
- if you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations 76
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer be sure to use your own word 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1028708134 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77763971534 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533492822967 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6192996001 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.65 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196752020749 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057352259335 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578351647203 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116681735664 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422374445576 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.