Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is impossible
to always be completely honest with your friends.
It goes without saying that interpersonal connection between people can play a pivotal part in everyone’s life. Being a hundred percent honest with friends has always been a matter of hot debate. While some hold the view that friends must always tell each other the truth, others consider this trend impractical. Personally, I believe that although honesty is the best policy, there are some exceptions that people can not be totally honest in their companionships. The reasons substantiating my standpoint are elaborated hereunder.
To begin with, everyone needs privacy, and they can not tell all the secrets about their private lives, which may cause some trouble for them when their friendships end. To be more specific, in today’s world, even the most intimate relationships are prone to be broken up. Myriads of friends turn to foes after they sever their connection. Therefore, opening up about every detail of private life does not seem a sensible way of interaction with friends. My sister’s experience is a convincing example of this. When she was studying at university, she used to have a peer with whom she spent most of her time. They would talk with each other about their lovers, and sometimes, my sister complained about her boyfriend’s behaviors. Unfortunately, their friendship ended after graduation. However, after my sister married her fiance, her friend revealed a mean streak and disclosed all my sister’s secrets to her husband. As a result, it broke the trust between my sister and her spouse. Thereby, she had to deal with several relationship issues afterward.
Secondly, being fully honest with companions can hurt their feelings at times. To put this idea into a more vivid picture, there are some occasions in which being brutally honest with someone else can lower his self-esteem. It is much more critical when the one we are having a conversation with is our loved ones or our friends. It is crystal clear that no one tends to upset his friend. Therefore, telling a white lie would be considered an intelligent way of keeping our friends’ self-confidence high. For instance, last week, one of my close friends got a new haircut and came to me for my opinion about her look. She was so pleased with her hairstyle that even though it looked terrible to me, I started to make some compliments about her new appearance. Needless to say, her happiness was more important to me than being totally frank with her. After all, a minor lie about an insignificant matter would not cause any trouble, but it might keep her even more delighted and confident.
As shown above, one could conclude that there are several times in people’s lives that they can not keep being honest with their friends. It is because always telling the truth about private affairs of life may result in future troubles and because individuals may upset their peers by speaking about their actual thoughts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-29 | eglantine74 | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involving in their children's education than were parents in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country that from traveling to foreign countries. 86
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to people in 90
- TPO 39 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, after all, for instance, speaking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2464.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05954825462 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83949050715 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554414784394 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.500999812 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2592592593 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.037037037 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.03703703704 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173800716426 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564283824617 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613320852184 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122991742072 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167385883026 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.