Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Without a doubt, working and having a suitable career is the most enjoyable thing that every individual could have in this hectic world. I believe that having three days a week for long hours is better rather than more days with fewer hours. I feel this way for two reasons which I explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, going to work some days in a week for long hours might be more effectively rather than working every day in a week. Besides, people could save their time and energy to do other works spent more time with family and friends. When people work a few days a week, they will able to undertake great responsibilities and could work around the clock on those specific days they have to work. My father's example is a good compelling on this. When I was a child, I remember my father came to work every day even weekends from 6 in the morning till 8 in the evening. Since that time, my father always feels tired and exhausted from everything and never have spare time to be with family and especially us whom we were children. For his reason, he got old and sick that way of working as a threat to his health. That is why working with some limitations could be more beneficial even though the income would be less than enough.
Secondly, by working some days in a week people could able to find out more free time to take care of their health and do regular exercise. Research findings confirm that these days' people who are city dwellers are more likely to be in health danger compared with other people who live in the suburbs. Therefore, by working some days a week people have more time to do regular practices and enhance their standard of living in the long run. Since my husband had chosen to work every other day, he felt tired once in a blue moon due to his schedule. Besides, if he worked every day, he might not able to reach other responsibilities, so this might cause serious problems in his life.
To sum up, I strongly believe that working some days a week would be a decisive factor in our lives to manage our programs. This is because it is more enjoyable to have more time for personal staff and be with families. After all, people could take more attention to their lifestyle and being healthy physically and day in the sun.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 76
- Genetic modification a process used to change an organism s genes and hence its characteristics is now being used to improve trees It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit grow faster or withstand adverse conditions Planting genetically modi 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 43
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Populations of the yellow cedar a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America have been steadily declining for more than a century now since about 1880 Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this decline One hypothesis is tha 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, after all, i feel, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44258373206 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32834121665 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49043062201 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8590998721 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.7368421053 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332215869189 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124287846371 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997695900251 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243369880689 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603161302215 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.