Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
It is undeniable that having a little bit of joy during your job will increase your efficiency and will make it easier to accomplish. Job by itself is a stressful, hard and a time consuming everyday task in adults life, so it is very important to find a way to make it more enjoyable. I believe that working for three days a week for many hours rather than five with the regular hours will do that. I think this way for two reasons, which I am going to explain in the following assay.
To begin with, working for three days is a money savier. In fact, it is a good way to achieve your dream. If you work for three days, you will be able to save many expenses, such as gas, lunch, and even clothes. For instance, that what happened with me when I switched my shift last year to be three days a week for 10 hours rather than six hours for five days. Due to that switch, I was able to save four thousand dollars, which I used it as a down payment for my first car.
Second, three days work means four days off, and that means that people will have more time to spend with friends and family. Consequently, they are going to have more fun and joy in their lives. For example, when I started the new job schedule, I had mor time with my kids, therefor, we were able to go to disney land last month, and we are planning to go to the beach on my next days off. My daughter had the best comment about that. She told me that I became the mom of the year since I started working for three days a week. To be honest, what she said make me the happiest person in the world.
To sum up, I think working for three days a week for long hours is mor enjoyable than working for five days and shorter hours. It is not only because it saves money, but also it gives people more time to enjoy their life with their beloved ones. That is why I strongly encourage all people to do that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Sometimes it is better to be dishonest with people than to always tell them the truth 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most of the biggest problems in the world will be solved in the next few decades Use details and examples to support your 70
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 60
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
It is undeniable that having a little bit of joy during your job will increase yo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter had the best comment about that. She told me that I became the mom of the yea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.09782608696 4.8611393121 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07383072255 2.67179642975 78% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494565217391 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.51630824373 79% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9294516756 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7777777778 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46218139843 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135407570032 0.076458572812 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131622554134 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29289696304 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508573173169 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 58.1214874552 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.5 10.9000537634 60% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 86.8835125448 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.