Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The balance between work-live balance and efficacy of work is a substantial issue in the industry and it is also related to the well-being of workers. Some people suggest that working three days a week for longer hours is better than working five days a week but working shorter per day is better. In my view, I agree with this idea, and my reasons are shown as follows.
Admittedly, some people may claim that working fives days a week provides people more time to relax in the daily basis. However, it is not the case in most of industries. To be specific, nowadays people usually work in task-oriented jobs, that is, only after the work assigned to them is accomplished they can get go home, and if they don't accomplish it on-time, they need to work overtime. Therefore, this circumstance largely diminishes the benefit of the mode working five days a week.
On the other hand, working three days a week provides more flexibilities for me in organizing my life. To illustrate, we possess four days of totally-free break if we choose to work three days a week. In these period, we can enjoy our vacations whole-heart. For instance, we can plan a short trip to go to suburb overnight and immerse ourselves into the natural places. Or, we can participate in some classes, like horticulture courses or scuba diving courses, which normally takes three or more days to be completed. Thus, working three days a week affords workers a more flexible times and open more possibilities experiencing their leisure time.
Furthermore, the more intense work for continuous days boosts my potential and concentration which increase the efficiency in the work space. People's short-term memories are limited. Consider that you are trying to memorize some vocabularies. Many people will find they forget almost all the new words that they worked on last day after an overnight sleep. Similarly, in the plan of working three days a week, people have shorter intermittent between two days, therefore, they can work more smoothly from the work they have done yesterday. Consequently, they can concentrate more on the work but not on the repeat effort that is needed to associate their works from yesterday to current work. As a result, workers will enjoy the sense of success from the efficiency.
To sum up, from the analysis above, I maintain that working three days a weeks is a more effective way to increase the happiness of workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished 79
- It is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public 83
- The purpose of education should be provide students with a value system a standard a set of ideas not to prepare them for specific job 62
- In any realm of life whether academic social business or political the only way to succeed is to take a practical rather than an idealistic point of view Pragmatic behavior guarantees survival whereas idealistic views tend to be supersede by simpler more 83
- The arts painting music literature etc reveal the otherwise hidden ideas and impulses of a society 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the industries') or simply say ''most industries''.
Suggestion: most of the industries; most industries
...y basis. However, it is not the case in most of industries. To be specific, nowadays people usuall...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ished they can get go home, and if they dont accomplish it on-time, they need to wor...
^^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a week' or simply 'weeks'?
Suggestion: a week; weeks
...ove, I maintain that working three days a weeks is a more effective way to increase the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as a result, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91019417476 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75436888926 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521844660194 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8944845079 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.619047619 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358550663377 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111987859086 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870931044569 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216139968825 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549526460909 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.