Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only 3 days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work 5 days a week for shorter hours.
Job plays a prominent role in an individual’s life since we spend more days of our life at work. In this regard, many people believe that fewer workdays for longer hours are more enjoyable than more days for shorter hours. In my opinion, having fewer working days provide a more satisfying life for a person. In what follows, I will pinpoint the two most primary reasons to elaborate on my viewpoint.
To begin with, fewer work days make our lives more fulfilling and enables us to pursue our passions. That is to say, by spending less time at work, people have more free time to spend with their family or have a vacation. My personal experience as an employee is a compelling example of this. I have been working in a publication company for two years, and in this period, I would be able to follow my desire to have a trip around the world. My work time is from 8 a.m until 6 p.m for three days of the week. I always use my leisure days to visit new historical and natural attractions in my country and others. This type of working time provides me with a chance to have my dream life to have a trip and learn about new cultures and landscapes. As a result, fewer working days provide a more desirable live for people to using the benefits of more free days.
Furthermore, fewer workdays will improve the efficiency of workers in the long run. To elaborate on this idea more fully, when people know that they have just three days of work, they better concentrate on their duties and responsibilities. Although working more hours in a day seems to deplete the worker's energy, when they know to have work for fewer days, they would prefer this condition. On the other hand, less working hours does not have many advantages since people always spend such free time watching television or spend it in a traffic jam. As I said above, I work for three days in the office, and this condition motivates me to better concentrate on my tasks and doing them properly to have a mindless vacation. How??due to traffic? Give more details about efficiency! Therefore, when people have fewer workdays and follow more vacation days, they will be energized to pay more attention to their tasks and feel more responsible for their work. >> this example needs some more details to be more compelling!
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally One cannot learn how to develop it 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development 70
- nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company why might this be the case what could be disadvantages of being self employed 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally One cannot learn how to develop it 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...de a more satisfying life for a person. In what follows, I will pinpoint the two m...
^^
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o using the benefits of more free days. Furthermore, fewer workdays will improve...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ore hours in a day seems to deplete the workers energy, when they know to have work for...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60635696822 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50971224689 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474327628362 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7099531 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334225146151 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117139202825 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767743859142 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256278878275 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165591962814 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.