Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

When we talk about how many days that we should spend on working, there will always be two different opinions. On one hand, people may claim that it is better to have more time to rest, so they can be mentally prepared for working. On the other hand, some may argue that work five days a week is better. For me, I believe that a job where I work five days a week for shorter hours is more enjoyable, for the following reasons.

To begin with, human's capacity of attention is limited, which means that it is hard for people to focus on effortful tasks for long period of time. If people work three days a week but for long hours, they probably cannot work efficiently. Take my personal experience for example. I remember that the company that I am working for received tremendous orders last year, due to the outbreak of COVID-19, so I had no choice but to work longer hours. Although it was a special experience for me, since I never worked that long before, I felt that after working for eight hours, I barely focused on the task I was doing. As a result, I spent one and half hour to finish the task that I usually can finish in 30 minutes.

Moreover, if the number of days that we spend on resting are more than we spend on working, I think most people would have problems with getting back to working mode. This is the phenomenon that people like to say after the weekend, Monday blue. I believe that most of the people have experienced this feeling at least one time in the whole life. And this feeling is especially stronger when we just had a long holidays. For instance, every time I go to office after a long holidays, I always see my coworkers are in a mode of zoning out. This is because we are not mentally prepared for working yet, and work only three days a week could exacerbate this feeling.

Despite some people may say that working three days a week could help worker improve their mental health, since they have more time for activities that they are interested in. Nevertheless, if a company was operated by people who work inefficiently, that company may not be able to survive for too long. When a company is bankrupt, jobless could bring more mental issues to employees.

To conclude, though working three days a week sounds desirable, if we think deeply, it actually brings more problems than benefits.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-11 maryka72 60 view
2023-03-07 Hibahtabbaa 70 view
2023-02-27 kevin1105 66 view
2023-02-26 Hibahtabbaa 60 view
2023-02-23 can111 3 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ricky96 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...le to focus on effortful tasks for long period of time. If people work three days a week but f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, at least, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50823529412 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37920169217 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487058823529 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1431528785 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348715005858 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115214551825 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103789339683 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208629364484 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601732400222 0.0645574589148 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.