Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
In today's life, needing a source of earning money is undeniable. Hence, a job plays a significant role in each person's life. Since individuals spend a considerable time at the workplace, job satisfaction is an essential factor that should be considered in choosing an occupation. In this line of thought, some people believe that working just three days a week prolonged can be more pleasurable for an employee, rather than working five days a week regularly. Personally speaking, I cannot entirely agree with this idea for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that five-day working per week with less working time gives the persons a chance to spend more time with their family, especially their kids, during each day, thereby preventing conflicts with their loved ones. Moreover, a five-day work schedule allows all family members to have the same timeframe and enjoy their free time together. For example, while children are at school, their parents go to their 8-hour per day careers. After work and school, all the family can gather at home and mutually enjoy the rest of the day. Allocating sufficient hours to family leads to a strong relationship among family members and overall happiness in personal life.
The second exquisite point to be mentioned is that regarding people's hectic lives, it goes without saying that all people need some time to take their minds off of work and duties to reduce their stresses and work pressure. By working three days per week for long hours, individuals would face heavy pressure at the workplace, resulting in mental and physical health damage, which plays a pivotal role in people's lives. In addition, these health problems will directly affect employee's performance and decrease the company's outputs. So, neither the company nor the employees will have the satisfaction of this circumstance and cooperation.
In conclusion, having considered the reasons mentioned above into account, I believe that working for shorter hours during five days is more enjoyable since it provides the person with a condition to spend more time with the family. It will also increase the productivity and efficiency of the job both for the person and company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- TPO 50 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Nowadays a lot of students use technology like computers and smartphones for doing school work Some teachers believe that we should not limit students because it is an effective way of learning Others claim that we should limit students use of these devic 73
- task 1 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... a job plays a significant role in each persons life. Since individuals spend a conside...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14363143631 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64568885338 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550135501355 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9958537417 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332454989355 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102719458181 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826009957919 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214177328875 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549359857464 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.