Working was always a big concept for human beings. There are several aspects of different jobs to talk about, but one of the most important things is finding the best timing. For having a solution we should consider so many critical parameters. I believe working five days a week is much better than three days a week, and I have reasons to support my point of view.
To begin with, having very long work hours in a day can cause serious physical and mental health issues. Workers must always have enough time to recover themselves and avoid too much tension otherwise, they are going to get sick. Employers must consider their employees' health situation and care about them and treat them as their own family.
Furthermore, not having a good time break leads to less productivity. When we have an optimum work hour and then a sufficient break time after the job we can rest our body and mind. So that the next day we will be fresh and full of energy, which leads us to have our tasks done in the best way possible. But if we have to be at work late, three days a week, in the final hours of workdays we are going to lose our momentum and everyone will be bored and tired. So the total effect is going to drop and this manner is practically impossible.
To wrap it up, I extremely suggest that going to work for five days a week is a much better working approach. Not only is it healthier, but also it can lead to better work efficiency.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- tpo 30 70
- As a new teaching method professors record a video lecture in advance for students to learn and class time is used to answer questions and have discussions Do you think this is an effective way and why 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Mobile phones have given people more freedom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 31 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1977.66487455 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 268.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37686567164 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31100920229 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578358208955 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 618.680645161 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0885080721 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7857142857 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312788688261 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106759549714 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861279603599 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198230090888 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681700336355 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 58.1214874552 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.