Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays many companies are trying to plan different programs to increase their worker efficiency and satisfaction; one of the changes that are proposes is working only three days a week for long hours. There is a big debate about this plan. Some people think that it is beneficial for workers, while some others disagree. In my opinion, working long hours a day cannot help neither worker nor their families. I will elaborate on my view in the following essay.
First and foremost, working more than 8 hours has many side-effects for health in a long run. Our body is not designed to work long hours, after working four or five hours we should take a break to refresh our muscles; and our brain abilities such as concentration and programming will be declined after eight hours working. For this reasons, many worker unions all around of the world require companies to give worker at least half an hour rest for who work eight hours a day. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I started working in the pharmacy, I chose to work at the evening shift for eight hours. After a while one of our colleagues requested us to change our schedule and working 12 hours a day and only 3 days a week, and we tried that for two months. Although, at first week, working 12 hours a day was not hard, after a months we feel so tired in the workdays. Finally, all of us wanted to come back to previous schedule.
Second, three-day work and 4-day off plan will not provide more benefits for worker at all. Some people thinks that they have more time to spend with their families or to do another task; but the reality proves that it won't work. As an example, my brother is a fireman and works 3 long 24-hour shift in fire station; he says that in other days he should take rest long time to refresh his body and his mind. On the other hand he cannot spend more time with his family because when he is at home his wife and his children are out. Actually they do not have much more time with each other and their work-life balance does not match at all. He says that maybe he should think about choosing another job to work like other ordinary job to make a good balance between his family schedule and himself.
In conclusion, considering all aforementioned details and reasons, I strongly believe that working long hours a day and be off in four hours does not any advantages. This is because, our body and brain get tired after working more than eight hours, and our productivity declines sharply. And because, it will make a discrepancy between family members schedule which has more adverse effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest f 80
- Nowadays the world is developing at a very rapid pace and we are constantly forced to make a lot of choices that can affect the rest of our lives Do you agree or disagree with the idea that should always ask someone else for help when we need to make an i 73
- With the speculation by many leading geologists that petroleum reserves will be exhausted within the next fifty years a number of alternatives to petroleum have been proposed One of the most promising alternatives being researched is hydrogen cell technol 73
- TPO 14 Integrated Writing Task Every year forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practic 70
- TPO 30 question 2 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on my view in the following essay. First and foremost, working more than 8 ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...declined after eight hours working. For this reasons, many worker unions all around ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a month' or simply 'months'?
Suggestion: a month; months
...king 12 hours a day was not hard, after a months we feel so tired in the workdays. Final...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to come back to previous schedule. Second, three-day work and 4-day off pla...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'shift' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'shifts'.
Suggestion: shifts
...r is a fireman and works 3 long 24-hour shift in fire station; he says that in other ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en his family schedule and himself. In conclusion, considering all aforement...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, while, at least, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56475583864 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39211903791 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475583864119 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0192448293 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7272727273 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4090909091 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32355327629 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101546076247 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654337590653 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198064558357 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489933127744 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.