Do You Agree Or Disagree With The Following Statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use Specific Reasons and Examples To Support Your Opinion
As we are social beings, we cannot live alone. Because of that, we need friends around us. Everyone has their own reasons for making friends. I believe that keeping your old friends is much more crucial than making new ones. I feel this way for three main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, It is really hard to trust people in today`s world that we do not know well. Old friends are the people who gained our trust earlier. Our old friends know lots of things about us. When we have a problem, they are the ones that will help us very quickly, and find the best solution fits to us. My best friend who is from my highscool years, knows me very well. For example, when I can not decide what to buy as a cloth, she offers me the best one, as she knows my character.
Furthermore, making friends is a hard process, and nowadays it is really hard to make friends. Of course, we can meet new people and also have a good time together, but making friends is a different thing. My own experience is a good example of this. My all old friends are from my high school. When I attended university, I had lots of people around me. We had classes, had meals, spent good time together, and so on. But, after we graduated, none of my friends from university called me nor I called them. Because, these friendships were not real, we just spent our time in university. I think, If you share a place with different people, it is like an obligation to hang out with them. It is just permanent, not temporary.
In conclusion, some of people may think that having new friends is important. However, I feel that people should keep their old friends than making new friends, in order to live happily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | m_elec | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | JohnSmith96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Navis | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | swapnil.paliwal | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | swapnil.paliwal | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the people') or simply say ''some people''.
Suggestion: some of the people; some people
...nent, not temporary. In conclusion, some of people may think that having new friends is im...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, well, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4263322884 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36042454924 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53605015674 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1683180686 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.3913043478 100.406767564 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8695652174 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60869565217 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218566432201 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065562691893 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810618986806 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15281814482 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662024132429 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.4 11.7677419355 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 58.1214874552 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.1575268817 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.82 10.9000537634 72% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.51 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 86.8835125448 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.