Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in today’s world, governments allocate their budgets in different fields. Two fields that are important to invest in are public transportation and access to the internet. I believe that financing on improving internet access is more momentous than on public transportation. In the ensuing paragraphs, the reasons substantiating my viewpoint are elaborated.
To begin with, it is significant to be mentioned that in this modern era, technology and its consequences have affected people’s lives. To be more specific, individuals do not devote their time to move among places for their affair such as shopping, and do these subjects online. An example drives this home. I have investigated that if I need a cloth, it will take at least 4 hours to go to the clothes store, browse between different regales and opt for your favorite cloth. However, if I utilize the internet to select the cloth from websites, it will take only 30 minutes to find my favorite cloth and save my precious time and energy, which are consumed to use public transportation and walking through different stores. Thus, needless to say, people can save more time and energy by making use of internet than of public transportation.
Furthermore, nowadays, many students register in online courses from all over the world without commuting between home and the university that may be far distant. To put this into a more vivid picture, people even in a different continent use online classes to promote their education. Additionally, in our sophisticated world, everything is found in the internet and accessing to the internet provides individuals an ocean of information. It is no secret to anyone that these information, which their accuracy could be examined easily, are used to conduct online research and investigations. As a case in point, an in-depth study conducted in some developing countries indicates that in today’s advanced system of education, there are some graduated students in a less-developed country such as Uganda in the African continent, who utilized online classes to study in the University of Harvard, one of the best universities in the world. Now, they are very prosperous in the universities in Uganda and are utilizing their knowledge to promote their country’s stage in the science and industry. Indeed, had this online education not proffered, these individuals have not developed their countries level of science.
To sum up, taking all the reasons and points mentioned above into account, one could conclude that funding to improve internet access is more important than supporting public transportation financially. It is because not only, can people save their time and energy, but also they can utilize online education and promote the level of their knowledge.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...rmation. It is no secret to anyone that these information, which their accuracy could be examined...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, at least, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2377.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29398663697 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06351790247 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521158129176 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8618128611 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.105263158 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6315789474 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199795920888 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709661106796 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872887387719 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150472793545 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779921334085 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.