Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
It is more important for the government to spend money on new buildings than to preserve historic or traditional buildings and homes.
Buildings have been more and more valued and even triggered a heated discussion over whether the government should construct new buildings or preserve old homes. In my opinion, the construction of new architecture is more important because new buildings are safer and can enhance the utilization rate of the same land.
Some claim that the government should spend money saving and updating traditional buildings because they represent the history of the city, and citizens are familiar with them. However, compared with unsafe and useless historic homes, only traditional buildings such as the Forbidden City can on behalf of the cultural history of a city, which are very rare. So I believe it is more vital for the government to spend money on creating new architectures so that enormous citizens can benefit from them.
Firstly, constructing new buildings can guarantee the safety of residents. Historic buildings have been used for decades, its concrete structure can be calcified, so that the foundation can be fragile. Meanwhile, many old buildings are not equipped with an emergency exit path, which can be very dangerous when encountered accidents like fire or earthquake. For instance, about last year, a woman lived on the eighth floor of a residential building constructed in forty years ago fell to her death when she was drying clothes on the balcony, the balcony collapsed as well. After research, it came out that the structure of the balcony aged so seriously that it could not stand with strong winds and weight. There are so many similar historic buildings in the world, and the government cannot afford to repair all of them. So, it is better to construct strong and robust new buildings to prevent such events from occurring.
Meanwhile, building new architectures in the same land can enhance the utilization rate. It is universal that the number of layers is limited in old buildings because of the lack of elevators. As the development of urbanization and the increase of population, original buildings cannot provide enough space for citizens. To be more specific, I used to live in a small community whose buildings are of five floors and all rooms are occupied. When population increased, people separate their house into several rooms to accommodate more people, we all lived a hard life. Then the government constructed new buildings for us on the same land, but of twenty floors, we did not to bear the small space anymore. By doing so, the government increase the using of the same land and win the embrace of thousands of residentials.
In conclusion, constructing new architectures are more important for the government, for they can guarantee the safety of citizens and increase the utilization rate of the same land, which will benefit both the government and citizens.
- Do you agree or disagree Most people think that some important problems can be solved by themselves or by thier families and thus it is almost not necessary to refer to the government 76
- Some people think governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and diseases To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to succeed in study or job the ability to adjust or adapt to changing conduction or circumstance is more important than having excellent knowledge 48
- Modern agriculture methods damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12608695652 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84777630225 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480434782609 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2797657834 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348173883104 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115656190885 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537089466777 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213699811393 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509943876946 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.